M.Yu. ULYANIN¹, A.R. AMIROV¹, M.I. KHASANOVA^1, 2, A.N. GAYNULLOV¹, O.M. KADYROV¹, A.M. AMIRYAN¹, K.V. SITKINA¹

¹Republican Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan

² Kazan State Medical Academy – Branch Campus of  RMACPE MH Russia, Kazan

Contact details:

Ulyanin M.Yu. — Head of the Department of Urology

Address: 138 Orenburgskiy trakt, Kazan, Russian Federation, 420064, tel.: +7-987-422-79-69, e-mail: Mikhail_ulyanin@mail.ru

Purpose — to evaluate the possibilities of video laparoscopic kidney sampling from a donor, for related transplantation and the early postoperative period.

Currently, treatment of the terminal stage of chronic renal failure can be carried out by means of renal replacement therapy or kidney transplantation, the latter being preferred. Given the shortage of donor organs, work is underway to attract people for living-related transplantation. Nowadays, open surgery is considered the «gold standard» of nephrectomy for related transplantation, but it can be accompanied by a patient’s fear of great trauma, severe pain in the postoperative period and prolonged hospitalization, which cannot be said about a video of laparoscopic nephrectomy, in which all of the above items are significantly below. There is a trend from open nephrectomy to video laparoscopic nephrectomy in developed countries, and this will probably help donors who want to assist their relatives in overcoming the fear of surgery.

Key words: chronic kidney disease, live kidney donor, transplantation, video laparoscopic nephrectomy. 

(For citation: Ulyanin M.Yu., Amirov A.R., Khasanova M.I., Gaynullov A.N., Kadyrov O.M., Amiryan A.M.,. Sitkina K.V. Video laparoscopic nephrectomy in a living donor for related transplantation. Practical Medicine. 2019. Vol. 17, № 6 (part 2), P. 90-93)

REFERENCES

1. Nefrologiya: natsional’noe rukovodstvo, pod red. N.A. Mukhina. Seriya “Natsional’nye rukovodstva” [Nephrology: national leadership, ed. N.A. Mukhin. Series «National Guides»]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2009. 720 p.
2. Schlieper G., Hess K., Floege J. et al. The vulnerable patient with chronic kidney disease. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2016, vol. 31, pp. 382–390.
3. As G., Chertow G.M., Fan D. et al. Chronic Kidney Disease and the Risks of Death, Cardiovascular Events, and Hospitalization. N Engl J Med, 2016, vol. 351, pp. 1296–1305.
4. Chillon J.M., Massy Z.A., Stengel B. Neurological complications in chronic kidney disease patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2016, vol. 31, pp. 1606–1614.
5. Goh Z.S., Griva K. Anxiety and depression in patients with end-stage renal disease: impact and management challenges – a narrative review. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis, 2018, vol. 11, pp. 93–102.
6. Levin A., Tonelli M., Bonventre J. et al. Global kidney health 2017 and beyond: a roadmap for closing gaps in care, research, and policy. Lancet, 2017, vol. 390, pp. 1888–1917.
7. Stanifer J.W., Muiru A., Jafar T.H. et al. Chronic kidney disease in low- and middle-income countries. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2016, vol. 31, pp. 868–374.
8. Salazar A., Pelletier R., Yilmaz S. et al. Use of a minimally invasive donor nephrectomy program to select technique for live donor nephrectomy. Am J Surg, 2005, vol. 189 (5), pp. 558–562.
9. Mehrabi A., Fonouni H., Golriz M. et al. Living-donor kidney transplantation. Chirurg, 2010, vol. 81 (9), p. 794.
10. Kok N.H., Weimar W., Alwayn I.P., Ijzermans J.N. The current practice of live donor nephrectomy in Europe. Transplantation, 2006, vol. 82 (7), pp. 892–897.
11. Shokeir A.A. Open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry. J Urol, 2007, vol. 178 (5), pp. 1860–1866.
12. Tooher R.L., Rao M.M., Scott D.E., Wall D.R., Francis D.M.A., Bridgewater F.H., Maddern G.J. A systematic review of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation, 2004, vol. 78 (3), pp. 404–414.
13. Giessing M. Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2004, vol. 19 (Suppl. 4), pp. 36–40.
14. Hoda M.R., Hamza A., Greco F. et al. Early and late graft function after laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy for living kidney transplantation: comparison with open donor nephrectomy. Urol Int, 2010, vol. 84 (1), pp. 61–66.
15. Peters T.G., Repper S.M., Vincent M.C. et al. One hundred consecutive living kidney donors: modern issues and outcomes. Clin Transplant, 2002, vol. 16 (Suppl. 7), pp. 62–68.
16. Ratner L.E., Ciseck L.J., Moore R.G. et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation, 1995, vol. 60 (9), pp. 1047–1049.
17. Nicholson M.L., Kaushik M., Lewis G.R. et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg, 2010, vol. 97 (1), pp. 21–28.
18. Matas A.J., Bartlett S.T., Leichtman A.B., Delmonico F.L. Morbidity and mortality after living kidney donation, 1999-2001: Survey of United States Transplant Centers. Am J Transplant, 2003, vol. 3 (7), pp. 830–834.
19. Hadjianastassious V.G., Johnson R.J., Rudge C.J., Mamode N. 2509 living donor nephrectomies, morbidity and mortality, including the UK introduction of laparoscopic donor surgery. Am J Transplant, 2007, vol. 7 (11), pp. 2532–2537.
20. Fonouni H. et al. Comparison of the laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: an overview of surgical complications and outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2014, vol. 399, pp. 543–551.