M.E. ZHELEZOVA¹, T.P. ZEPHIROVA¹, N.E. YAGOVKINA², M.A. NYUKHNIN¹, N.Yu. CHISTYAKOVA²

¹Kazan State Medical Academy — Branch Campus of the RMACPE MOH Russia, 36 Butlerov Str., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012

²Kazan (Volga) Federal University, 1A Chekhov Str., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420000

 Zhelezova M.E. — Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 1, tel. (843) 236-345-11, e-mail: gelezovam@gmail.com

Zephirova T.P. — D. Med. Sc., Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 1, tel. +7-987-290-45-99, e-mail: tzerirova@gmail.com

Yagovkina N.E. — doctor of the Maternity Department, tel. +7-987-290-48-25, e-mail: natashadoc@yandex.ru

Nyukhnin M.A. — Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 1, Deputy Director on Scientific Work, tel. (843) 233-34-99, e-mail: 9178739294@mail.ru

Chistyakova N.Yu. — Cand. Med. Sc., Head of the Maternity Department, tel. 8 -987-296-86-32, e-mail: ninadoc@rambler.ru

 Pathology of labor is one of the topical issues of modern obstetrics. The review presents the basic pathogenic mechanisms that underlie various abnormalities of uterine contractile activity. Etiological factors of labor weakness and hypertonic uterine dysfunction are analyzed. The effect of labor duration on perinatal outcomes article shown. The issues are discussed of accelerated or prolonged labor impact on the frequency of stillbirths, early neonatal morbidity and remote negative consequences to children’s health.

Key words: labor abnormalities, prolonged labor, accelerated labor, perinatal outcomes.

REFERENCES

1. Vsemirnaya organizatsiya zdravookhraneniya [World Health Organization], available at: www.who.int
2. Arutyunyan T.G., El’zhorukaeva Zh.A., Sarkisova E.I. et al. Modern ideas about the regulation of labor activity. Zhurnal fundamental’noy meditsiny i biologii, 2013, no. 1, pp. 29–32 (in Russ.).
3. Sostoyanie zdorov’ya beremennykh, rozhenits, rodil’nits i novorozhdennykh. Pokazateli zdorov’ya materi i rebenka, deyatel’nosti sluzhby okhrany detstva i rodovspomozheniya [Health status of pregnant women, parturient women, puerperas and newborns. Health indicators of mother and child, child welfare and obstetrics services], available at: www.gks.ru
4. Botoeva E.A., Reshetnikova N.S., Ivanova I.V. et al. Obstetric bleeding. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2009, no. 2, p. 75 (in Russ.).
5. Egorova N.A., Dobrotina A.F., Strukova V.I. et al. Anomalii rodovoy deyatel’nosti: ucheb.-metod. posobie 2-e izd. [Anomalies of labor: a teaching method. allowance. 2^nd ed.]. Nizhniy Novgorod: NGMA, 2005.
6. Aylamazyan E.K. Neotlozhnaya pomoshch’ v akusherstve: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey pererab. i dop. [Emergency care in obstetrics: a manual for doctors is revised and added]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2015.
7. Abramchenko V.V. Rodovaya deyatel’nost’ i ee regulyatsiya [Generic activity and its regulation]. Saint Petersburg, 2006.
8. Baev O.R., Belousova V.S. Anomalies of labor in primiparas over 30 years of age. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii, 2005, no. 4, pp. 5–10 (in Russ.).
9. Volkov V.G., Sobolenkov O.V. Predicting the course and outcome of labor in women with premature outpouring of amniotic fluid. Vestnik novykh meditsinskikh tekhnologiy, 2013, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 346–348 (in Russ.).
10. Zhelezova M.E., Mal’tseva L.I., Zefirova T.P. Rapid births in terms of assessment of the norm and pathology. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya, 2016, no. 11, pp. 64–69 (in Russ.).
11. Kozonov G.R. Discordination of labor: theory and practice. Uchenye zapiski SPb.GMU im. akad. I.P. Pavlova, 2014, vol. XXI, no. 1, pp. 79–81 (in Russ.).
12. Nazarenko L.G. Actual representations concerning forecasting, diagnostics, correction of anomalies of patrimonial activity. Zdorov’e zhenshchiny, 2013, no. 4, p. 12 (in Russ.).
13. Montan S. Increased risk in the elderly parturient. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007, vol. 19, no. 2, rr. 110–112.
14. Khoshnood B. Impact of maternal age on fecundity and women’s and childern’s health. J. Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reprodaction (Paris), 2008, vol. 37, no. 8, rr. 733–747.
15. Savitskiy A.G. Structure of abnormalities of labor in modern obstetrics. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney, 2005, no. 2, pp. 17–22 (in Russ.).
16. Strel’tsova V.L. Discoordinated generic activity from the position of the theory of adaptation reactions. Tikhookeanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal, 2012, no. 4, pp. 51–54 (in Russ.).
17. Ushakova G.A., Petrich L.N. Modern ideas about the mechanisms of development of labor activity. Mat’ i ditya v Kuzbasse, 2016, no. 2, pp. 4–10 (in Russ.).
18. Zlobina A.V., Karakhalis L.Yu., Penzhoyan G.A. et al. Anomalies of labor activity by hypotonic type: causes of occurrence. Kubanskiy nauchnyy meditsinskiy zhurnal, 2011, no. 5, pp. 54–58 (in Russ.).
19. Savel’eva G.M., Kulakov V.I., Strizhakov A.N. et al. Akusherstvo [Obstetrics]. Moscow: Meditsina, 2000.
20. Savitskiy A.G. Hypertensive dysfunction of the uterus in modern obstetrics: issues of pathogenesis, terminology and identification. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney, 2006, no. 2, pp. 32–41 (in Russ.).
21. Dare M.R., Middleton P., Crowther C.A. et al. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane. Datebase. Syst. Rev, 2006, vol. 25, no. 1, rr. 32–38.
22. Madazli R., Somunkiran A., Calay Z. et al. Histomorphology of the placenta and the placental ed of growth restricted foetuses and correlation with the Doppler velocimetriebs of the uterine and umbilical arteries. Placenta, 2003, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 510–516.
23. Dmitrieva S.L., Khlybova S.V. Violations of the contractile activity of the uterus as one of the urgent problems in modern obstetrics (review of literature). Vyatskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal, 2011, no. 1, pp. 25–33(in Russ.).
24. Dmitrieva S.L., Khlybova S.V. The course of the gestational process in women with violations of the contractile activity of the uterus in childbirth. Vyatskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal, 2010, no. 1, pp. 23–28 (in Russ.).
25. Lebedenko E.S. Prognozirovanie bystrykh i stremitel’nykh rodov po dinamike parametrov dykhatel’nogo sinkhronizma pri sroke beremennosti 38–39 nedel’: avtoref. dis. kand. med. nauk [Prediction of fast and rapid delivery according to the dynamics of the parameters of respiratory synchronism at the term of pregnancy 38-39 weeks. Synopsis of dis. PhD med. sciences]. Krasnodar, 2007.
26. Kuz’mina O.A. The state of immunological factors and cytokines in parturient women with discordant and excessively strong labor activity. Vestnik Khar’kovskogo natsional’nogo universiteta im. V.N. Karazina. Seriya Meditsina, 2006, no. 12, pp. 86–89 (in Russ.).
27. Chernukha E.A. Rodovoy blok: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey [Family block: a guide for doctors]. Moscow: Triada Kh, 2003.
28. Danilack V.A., Dore D.D., Triche E.W. et al. The effect of labour induction on the risk of caesarean delivery: using propensity scores to control confounding by indication. BJOG, 2015, vol. 28, rr. 147–152.
29. Koucky M., Germanova Hajek Z. et al.  News in pathophysiology and management of preterm labour. Ceska. Gynekol, 2009, vol.74, no. 1, rr. 54–63.
30. Savitskiy A.G., Savitskiy G.A. «Discoordination of labor» — a long-lived parascientific myth or objective obstetric reality? Detskaya meditsina Severo-Zapada, 2011, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 6–15 (in Russ.).
31. Eser A., Zulfikaroglu E., Eserdag S. et al. Predictive value of middle cerebral artery to uterine artery pulsatility index ratio in preeclampsia. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet, 2011, vol. 284, no. 2, pp. 307–311.
32. Kleshchenogov S.A. Neurovegetative risk factors for labor-related anomalies from data on the variability of cardiac rhythm in mother. Sibirskiy nauchnyy meditsinskiy zhurnal, 2012, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 96–101 (in Russ.).
33. Srinivas S.K., Sammel M.D. Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: does maternal age aftect safety and success? Pediatric. Perinatal Epidemiology, 2007, vol.21, no. 2, rr. 114–120.
34. Gibb W., Challis J.R. Mechanisms of term and preterm birth Text. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can, 2002, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 855–860.
35. Zefirova T.P. The role of infectious pathology in the development of abnormalities of labor activity. Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2007, no. 1, pp. 5–7 (in Russ.).
36. Silveira M.F., Ghanem K.G., Erbelding E.J. et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birh. Int. J. STD AIDS, 2009, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 465–469.
37. Mal’tseva L.I. Modern problems of infectious pathology in obstetrics and gynecology. Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2010, no. 2(41), pp. 20–23 (in Russ.).
38. Zefirova T.P., Zhelezova M.E., Yagovkina N.E. Anomalies of labor: mechanisms of formation and risk factors. Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2010, no. 4, pp. 44–48 (in Russ.).
39. Radzinskiy V.E. Akusherskaya agressiya [Obstetric aggression]. Moscow: Izd-vo zhurnala StatusPraesens, 2011.
40. Zhelezova M.E., Yagovkina N.E. Influence of rapid and rapid delivery on perinatal outcomes for mother and newborn. Vestnik sovremennoy klinicheskoy meditsiny, 2016, iss. 2, pp. 133–137 (in Russ.).
41. Moldenhauer J.S. Protracted Labor, available at: www.merckmanuals.ru
42. Harrison M.S., Althabe F., Ali S. et al. A prospective population-based study of maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes in the setting of prolonged labor, obstructed labor and failure to progress in low- and middle-income countries, available at: www.biomedcentral.com
43. Awan S., Bibi S., Makhdoom A., Pak. J. et al. Adverse fetomaternal outcome among pregnant overweight women. Med. Sci, 2015, vol.31, no. 2, pp. 383–387.
44. Al-Nufal B.A., Family J., Al A., Saleh N.M. Maternal complications and neonatal outcome in Arab women of a fast developing country. Community. Med, 2013, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 27.
45. Daemers D.O., Wijnen H.A., van Limbeek E.B. et al. The impact of obesity on outcomes of midwife-led pregnancy and childbirth in a primary care population: a prospective cohort study. BJOG, 2014, vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 1403–1423.
46. Koucky M., Germanova Z., Hajek et al. News in pathophysiology and management of preterm labour. Ceska. Gynekol, 2009, vol.74, no. 1, rr. 54–63.
47. Babkin P.S., Polyanskaya O.V. Analysis of labor activity, parameters of the ECG of parturient women taking into account obstetric activity. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov, 2008, no. 7, pp. 91–96 (in Russ.).
48. Karimova B.Zh., Gayday A.N., Zholdin A.B. Effect of epidural anesthesia on childbirth and fetal status. Meditsinskiy zhurnal Kazakhstana, 2014, no. 4, pp. 37–39 (in Russ.).
49. Savel’eva G.M., Karaganova E.Ya., Tret’yakova V.M. Is aggression justified in the management of childbirth? Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney, 2011, no. 3, pp. 24–31 (in Russ.).
50. Lalooei A., Hashemi S.R., Hossein M. Comparing the Effect of painless labor methods on duration of active phase of labor. Razavi. Int. J. Med, 2015, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 308.
51. Baev O.R., Rubtsova S.V., Vasil’chenko O.N. et al. The duration of «normal» birth in modern conditions. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya, 2012, no. 1, pp. 49–54 (in Russ.).
52. Podsvirova E.V., Romanova T.A., Gurova M.M. Influence of the course of pregnancy and childbirth on the state of health of a newborn child. Nauchnye vedomosti. Ser. Meditsina.Farmatsiya, 2014, no. 24, pp. 81–84 (in Russ.).
53. Cheng Y.W., Shaffer B.L., Nicolson J.M. et al. Second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously suggested. Obstet. Gynecology, 2014, vol. 123, 3, pp. 527–535.
54. Radzinskiy V.E., Kostin I.N. Obstetric aggression as the reason for the decrease in the quality of obstetrics. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov, 2005, no. 4, pp. 9–11 (in Russ.).
55. Laughon S.K., Branch D.W., Beaver J. et al. Changes in labor patterns over 50 years. American Journal Obstetrics Gynacology, 2012, vol. 206, issue 5, p. 419.
56. Voskresenskiy S.L., Lukanskaya E.N., Tesakova M.L. et al. Duration of safe infusion of the lateral delivery during delivery. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney, 2013, iss. 4, pp. 22–28 (in Russ.).
57. Klinicheskie lektsii po akusherstvu i ginekologii: rukovodstvo, pod red. Yu.E. Dobrokhotovoy [Clinical lectures on obstetrics and gynecology: management. Ed. by Dobrokhotova Yu.E.]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2009.
58. Baev O.R., Komissarova L.M., Puchko T.K. et al. Bazovyy protokol vedeniya rodov [Basic protocol of labor management]. Nauchnyy tsentr akusherstva, ginekologii i perinatologii im. Akademika V.I. Kulakova. Moscow, 2011.
59. Petrenko Yu.V., Ivanov D.O., Kurzina E.A. Assessment of organ failure in newborns. Byulleten’ Federal’nogo tsentra serdtsa, krovi i endokrinologii im. V.A. Almazova, 2011, no. 2, pp. 43–50 (in Russ.).
60. Semenkov O.G., Iova A.S., Sholomov I.A. The main causes and prognostic criteria for adverse outcomes in newborns who underwent intraventricular hemorrhage. Saratovskiy nauchno-meditsinskiy zhurnal, 2010, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 658–663 (in Russ.).
61. Zhelezova M.E. Risk factors and prognostic criteria for fast delivery. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa, 2017, no. 17 (3), pp. 59–65 (in Russ.).