pm mfvt1
    • Main page
      • About journal
      • Articles. Working with contents
      • Editor-in-chief
      • Editorial Council
      • Editorial Board


      • For authors
      • Standards for formatting information
      • Reviewing
      • Politics editorial board
      • Ethics of journal publications


      • For advertisers
      • Subscription
      • About the Publishing House
      • Contact us
  • Role and prospects of digital medical offices in the digitalization of primary healthcare

    Редактор | 2026, Literature reviews, Practical medicine part 24 №3. 2026 | 5 июня, 2026

    O.V. FATENKOV1, V.A. DYACHKOV1, G.O. FATENKOV1

     1Samara State Medical University, Samara

     Contact details:

    Dyachkov V.A. — PhD (Medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Propaedeutic Therapy with a course in cardiology

    Address: 7 Vladimirskaya St., 443030 Samara, Russian Federation, tel.: +7-927-010-11-74, e-mail: v.a.dyachkov@samsmu.ru

     Digitalization of primary healthcare is a priority area for modernizing medicine in Russia, particularly in terms of providing accessible medical care to rural populations. Feldsher-obstetric stations (FOS), traditionally the backbone of primary healthcare in remote areas, face a number of limitations: staffing shortages, a lack of specialist doctors, and low automation. A solution to these problems is the concept of a digital medical office (DMO), integrating traditional FOS functions with modern telemedicine technologies, portable diagnostic equipment, and electronic medical records. We analyzed scientific literature and regulatory documents for 2016–2026 and examined a pilot project to create a DMO in the Samara Region using the Health Check Up remote monitoring platform.

    The study results demonstrate that the implementation of the digital medical office (DMO) increases the availability of specialized medical care through telemedicine consultations, reduces diagnostic time thanks to instant data transfer, optimizes remote monitoring of patients with chronic non-communicable diseases, and reduces the workload of medical staff by automating routine processes. However, significant barriers to scaling this model were identified: insufficient infrastructure in remote areas, a shortage of qualified personnel, high cost of equipment, and unresolved problems with personal data protection. The prospects for the DMO development require the implementation of artificial intelligence systems to support medical decision-making, the expanded use of wearable devices, and software standardization.

    Conclusion. Digitalization of feldsher-obstetric stations (FOS) based on the DMO model can significantly improve the quality and accessibility of medical care for the rural population, provided technical, personnel, and organizational challenges are comprehensively addressed.

    Key words: digital medical office, feldsher-obstetric station, telemedicine, primary healthcare, remote monitoring, electronic medical records, chronic non-infectious diseases, digital transformation

    REFERENCES

    1. Shvan L.Yu., Gubareva I.V., Fatenkov O.V. et al. Telemedicine in pulmonology: achievements and prospects. Ul′yanovskiy mediko-biologicheskiy zhurnal, 2024, no. 4, pp. 6–24 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.34014/2227-1848-2024-4-6-24
    2. Treneva E.V., Bulgakova S.V., Fatenkov O.V. et al. Possibilities of using telemedicine interventions in the framework of providing specialized endocrinological care to the population. Eksperimental′naya i klinicheskaya gastroenterologiya, 2024, vol. 228, no. 8, pp. 281–290 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-228-8-281-290
    3. Vsemirnaya organizatsiya zdravookhraneniya. Tsifrovoye zdorov′ye: strategiya VOZ na 2020–2025 gg. Zheneva: VOZ; 2021 [World Health Organization. Digital health: WHO strategy 2020–2025. Geneva: WHO; 2021], available at: https://whodc.mednet.ru/ru/osnovnye-publikaczii/informaczionnye-texnologii-v-zdravooxranenii/4007.html (accessed on: 12.03.2026).
    4. Keesara S., Jonas A., Schulman K. Covid-19 and Health Care’s Digital Revolution. N. Engl. J. Med, 2020, vol. 382 (23), P. e82. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2005835
    5. Fatenkov O.V., D′yachkov V.A., Rubanenko A.O. et al. A system for supporting medical decision-making in predicting the severity of chronic heart failure. Meditsinskiy al′manakh, 2021, vol. 1, no. 66, pp. 16–23 (in Russ.).
    6. Fatenkov O.V., D′yachkov V.A., Rubanenko O.A. et al. Comprehensive analysis of the state of the cardiovascular system within the framework of an automated workstation for a cardiologist. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2021, no. 4, p. 97 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17513/spno.30990
    7. Levanov V.M., Perevezentsev E.A., Kalitkina O. Application of telemedicine technologies in the provision of medical care in obstetrics and gynecology (review). Rossiyskiy zhurnal telemeditsiny i elektronnogo zdravookhraneniya, 2021, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 23–30 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.29188/2712-9217-2021-7-2-23-30
    8. Vladzimirskiy A.V., Lebedev G.S. Telemeditsina: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey [Telemedicine: a guide for doctors]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2022. 320 p.
    9. Dorsey E.R., Topol E.J. State of Telehealth. N. Engl. J. Med, 2016, vol. 375 (2), pp. 154–161. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1601705
    10. Kalininskaya A.A., Son I.M., Cherepanova I.S. et al. The role of feldsher-midwife stations in the implementation of state guarantees for the rural population. Problemy sotsial′noy gigiyeny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny, 2021, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 345–349 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32687/0869-866X-2019-27-2-152-157
    11. Sidorov K.V., Yevdokimov A.O., Osmolovskiy I.S., Shvyrёv S.L., Kobyakova O.S. Electronic medical document management in the context of digital transformation of healthcare. Vrach i informatsionnyye tekhnologii, 2024, no. 4, pp. 6–19 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25881/18110193_2024_4_6
    12. Gusev A.V., Vladzimirskiy A.V., Golubev N.A., Zarubina T.V. Informatization of healthcare in the Russian Federation: history and results of development. Natsional′noye zdravookhraneniye, 2021, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 5–17 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.47093/2713-069X.2021.2.3.5-17
    13. Shlyakhto E.V., Konradi A.O., Villeval′de S.V. et al. Remote monitoring of patients with arterial hypertension: possibilities and prospects. Rossiyskiy kardiologicheskiy zhurnal, 2022, vol. 27, no. 3, p. 4899 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2022-4899
    14. Fatenkov O.V., Gubareva E.Yu., D′yachkov V.A. et al. Telemedicine technologies in cardiology: a literature review. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2024, no. 5 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17513/spno.33690
    15. Monakov D.M., Shaderkina A.I., Shaderkin I.A. Monitoring bladder filling in patients with neurogenic urination disorders: the role of wearable hardware and software systems. Eksperimental′naya i klinicheskaya urologiya, 2021, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 124–131 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2021-14-2-124-131
    16. Gusev A.V., Zingerman B.V., Tyufilin D.S., Zinchenko V.V. Electronic medical records as a source of real-life clinical practice data. Real′naya klinicheskaya praktika: dannyye i dokazatel′stva, 2022, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 8–20 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.37489/2782‑3784‑myrwd-13
    17. Dubrovin A.V., Koshkarov A.A. From PACS to Teleradiology. Diagnosticheskiye sistemy, 2017, no. 3, pp. 106–111 (in Russ.).
    18. Garanin A.A., Mullova I.S., Shkayeva O.V., Duplyakova P.D., Duplyakov D.V. Outpatient Remote Monitoring of Patients Discharged from the Emergency Cardiology Department. Rossiyskiy kardiologicheskiy zhurnal, 2022, vol. 27, no. 3S, p. 5072 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2022-5072
    19. Bashshur R.L., Shannon G.W., Smith B.R. et al. The empirical foundations of telemedicine interventions for chronic disease management. Telemed. J. E. Health, 2014, vol. 20 (9), pp. 769–800. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.9981
    20. Kobrinskiy B.A. Remote monitoring in e-healthcare and teleconsultation. Sibirskiy vestnik meditsinskoy informatiki i informatizatsii zdravookhraneniya, 2018, no. 1–2, pp. 4–7 (in Russ.).
    21. Starodubov V.I., Sidorov K.V., Zarubina T.V. Assessing the Level of Informatization of Medical Organizations at the Stage of Creating a Unified Digital Circuit in Healthcare. Vestnik Roszdravnadzora, 2020, no. 3, pp. 20–27 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.35576/2070-7940-2020-3-20-27
    22. Karpov O.E., Khramov A.E., Subbotin S.A. et al. Digital Competencies of Medical Workers: Challenges and Solutions. Vestnik Roszdravnadzora, 2021, no. 5, pp. 46–53 (in Russ.).
    23. Makarov V.O. Legal regulation of telemedicine in Russia // RUDN Journal of Law. RUDN J. Law, 2025, vol. 2 (29), pp. 562–581 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-2-562-581
    24. Gusev A.V., Pliss M.A., Levin M.B., Novitskiy R.E. Trends and forecasts for the development of medical information systems in Russia. Osoboye mneniye, 2019, no. 2, pp. 38–49 (in Russ.).

    Метки: 2026, chronic non-infectious diseases, digital medical office, digital transformation, electronic medical records, feldsher-obstetric station, G.O. FATENKOV, O.V. FATENKOV, Practical medicine part 24 №3. 2026, primary healthcare, remote monitoring, telemedicine, V.A. DYACHKOV

    Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of kidney diseases in children ›
    • rus Версия на русском языке


      usa English version site


      Find loupe

      

    • PARTNERS

      пов  logonew
    «Для
    Practical medicine. Scientific and practical reviewed medical journal
    All rights reserved ©