N.A. GABITOV¹, A.SH. SHAIKHUTDINOVA¹, M.I. MAZITOVA^1. 2, E.YU. ANTROPOVA^1, 2, K.V. FAUSTOVA¹

¹“Institute for Health and Longevity” Medical Clinic, Kazan

²Kazan State Medical Academy — Branch Campus of the FSBEI FPE RMACPE MOH Russia, Kazan

Contact details:

Antropova E.Yu. — PhD. (medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Address: 36 Butlerov St., 420012 Kazan, Russian Federation, tel.: +7-903-344-01-32, e-mail: antropoval@mail.ru

 Cervical cancer is a relevant problem of women’s reproductive health. According to statistics, it has high prevalence and still continues to expand. As for cancer patients, they are getting younger every year. That is why we need a wider introduction of organ-preserving treatment methods with the possibility of preserving fertility.

The purpose — to show that radical trachelectomy is both a rational way of early cervical cancer treatment and a possibility of realizing the patient’s reproductive potential in the future.

Material and methods. Analytical review of the Russian and foreign literature on the topic. Own data is also presented.

Results. This article presents a clinical observation of a patient after radical trachelectomy, whose childbearing function was successfully fulfilled twice with favorable outcomes, including the delivery through the natural birth canal.

Conclusion. This clinical observation is of scientific interest, since despite the diagnosis of cervical cancer, the patient fulfilled her reproductive potential twice, giving birth of healthy children.

Key words: trachelectomy, cervical cancer, HPV.

REFERENCES

1. Hurria A., Levit L.A., Dale W., Mohile S.G., Muss H.B., Fehrenbacher L. et al.; American Society of Clinical Oncology. Improving the evidence base for treating older adults with cancer: American Society of clinical oncology statement. J. Cli.n Oncol, 2015, vol. 33 (32), pp. 3826–3833. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0319.
2. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. Concise Report on the World Population Situation in 2014. New York: United Nations, 2014. 38 p., Naselenie Rossii do 2030 g.: demograficheskie i funktsional’nye prognozy [], available at: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/knigi/ns_09/acrobat/glava6.pdf
3. Robova H., Rob L., Halaska M.J., Pluta M., Skapa P. Review of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trachelectomy: which cervical cancer patients would be suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery? Curr. Oncol. Rep, 2015, vol. 17 (5), pp. 446. DOI: 10.1007/ s11912-015-0446-0
4. Chernyshova A.L., Kolomiets L.A., Krasil’nikov S.E. Organ-preserving treatment for invasive cervical cancer. Sibirskiy onkologicheskiy zhurnal, 2011, no. 2, pp. 72–78 (in Russ.).
5. Eifel P.J. Chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Semin. Radiat. Oncol, 2006, vol. 16 (3), pp. 177–185.
6. Khokhlova S.V., Kolomiets L.A., Kravets O.A., Krikunova L.I. et al. Prakticheskie rekomendatsii po lekarstvennomu lecheniyu raka sheyki matki. Prakticheskie rekomendatsii po lecheniyu zlokachestvennykh opukholey Rossiyskogo obshchestva klinicheskoy onkologii [Practical guidelines for drug treatment of cervical cancer. Practical guidelines for the treatment of malignant tumors of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology]. Moscow: RUSSCO, 2016, NCCN News. J. Natl Compr. Cancer Netw, 2017, vol. 15 (1). Pp. xxvi–xxvii.
7. Kravets O.A., Kuznetsov V.V., Morkhov K.Yu., Nechushkina V.M. et al. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii po diagnostike i lecheniyu raka sheyki matki [Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer]. Moscow, 2014.
8. Ungar L., Nechushkina V. M. Why is it necessary to perform extended operations for cervical cancer? Sibir. onkol. zhurn, 2013, no. 3, pp. 5–13 (in Russ.).
9. Wertheim E. The extended abdominal operation for carcinoma uteri (based on 500 operative cases). Am. J. Obstet. Dis. Women Child, 1912, vol. 66, pp. 169–232.
10. Querleu D., Morrow C.P. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Gynecol. Oncol, 2009, vol. 115 (2), pp. 314–315, pp. 315–316.
11. https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage
12. Volodin S.K., Kapelyushnik N.L. Khirurgicheskie metody lecheniya trubnogo besplodiya: ucheb. posobie [Surgical methods of treating tubal infertility: textbook]. Leningrad: Leningr. gos. in-t usoversh. vrachey im. S.M. Kirova, 1989. Pp. 46–49. UDK 618.12-089.86(075.9)
13. NMITs akusherstva, ginekologii i perinatologii im. Kulakova v ramkakh XV foruma “Mat’ i ditya” [Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology within the framework of the XV forum «Mother and Child»], available at: https://medvestnik.ru/content/news/Smertnost-ot-raka-sheiki-matki-v-Rossii-vyrosla-vdvoe-za-30-let.html
14. Antipov V.A., Novikova E.G., Balakhontseva O.S., Shevchuk A.S. Features of functional and anatomical rehabilitation after radical abdominal trachelectomy. Problemy reproduktsii, 2010, no. 1, pp. 103–107 (in Russ.).
15. Willows K., Lennox G., Covens A. Fertility-sparing management in cervical cancer: balancing oncologic outcomes with reproductive success. Gynecol. Oncol. Res. Pract, 2016, vol. 3, p. 9. DOI: 10.1186/s40661-016-0030-9
16. Chernyshova A.L., Kolomiets L.A., Sinilkin I.G., Chernov V.I., Lyapunov A.Yu. Optimization of approaches to the choice of the volume of surgical treatment in patients with cervical cancer (the role of sentinel lymph node examination). Voprosy onkologii, 2016, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 807–111 (in Russ.).
17. Antipov V.A., Novikova E.G., Balakhontseva O.S., Shevchuk A.S. Radical abdominal trachelectomy: technical aspects. Voprosy onkologii, 2010, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 36–42 (in Russ.).