I.V. KLYUCHAROV¹, E.I. PROKHOROV², S.L. BORISOV², R.F. KADYROV², R.N. FAKHRUTDINOV³

¹Kazan State Medical University, 49 Butlerov St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012

²ELEPS Ltd, 2в Dementyev St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420036

³Republican Clinical Hospital of the MH of RT, 138 Orenburgskiy trakt, Kazan, Russian Federation, 420064

Klyucharov I.V. — Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology № 1, tel. +7-917-282-44-74, e-mail: gynecolog@pisem.net

Prokhorov E.I. — Head of the Instrumentation Division of «ELEPS» Ltd, tel. +7-987-290-74-01, e-mail: eiprohorov@yandex.ru

Borisov S.L. — Leading Specialist of the Instrumentation Division of «ELEPS» Ltd, tel. (843) 203-58-38, e-mail: borisov@eleps.ru

Kadyrov R.F. — Leading Specialist of the Instrumentation Division of «ELEPS», tel. (843) 570-40-44, e-mail: kadyrovrf@eleps.ru

Fakhrutdinov R.N. — Cand. Med. Sc., Head of the Operating Unit, tel. (843) 231-20-47, e-mail: rinat_fa@mail.ru

The modern operating unit gives the possibility to combine different hysteropumps and hysteroscopes. The authors have discovered the differences between the preset and the real pressure measured in the uterine cavity. The value of difference between them is given. The practical significance of the observed fact is the necessity to correct the preset pressure taking into account the detected error, which will increase the safety and efficiency of hysteroresectoscopy and comfort of hysteroscopy in hospital.

Key words: hysteropump, hysteroscope, hysteroresectoscope, pressure, uterine cavity, office hysteroscopy, hysteroresectoscopy.

REFERENCES

1. Kumar A., Kumar A. New hysteroscopy pump to monitor real-time rate of fluid intravasation. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 2012, vol. 6(19); 3, pp. 369-375.
2. Strizhakov A.N., Davydov A.I. Gisterorezektoskopiya [Hysteroresectoscopy]. Moscow: Meditsina, 1997. 180 p.
3. Hysteroscopic Fluid Monitoring Guidelines. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc., 2000, vol. 7, pp. 167-168.
4. Park J.T., Lim H.K., Kim S.G. et al. A comparison of the influence of 2.7% sorbitol-0.54% mannitol and 5% glucose irrigating fluids on plasma serum physiology during hysteroscopic procedures. Korean J Anesthesiol., 2011, vol. 61(5), pp. 394-398.
5. Issa M.M., Young M.R., Bullock A.R. et al. Dilutional hyponatremia of TURP syndrome: a historical event in the 21st century. Urology, 2004, vol. 64(2), pp. 298-301.
6. Witz C.A., Silverberg K.M., Burns W.N. Complications associated with the absorption of hysteroscopic fluid media. Fertil Steril., 1993, vol. 60(5), pp. 745-56.
7. Ceana H. Nezhat, Deidre T. Fisher, Shoma Datta Investigation of often-reported ten percent hysteroscopy fluid overfill: Is this accurate? Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2007, vol. 14(4), pp. 489-493.