G.T. ZAGIDULLINA, A.I. KURBANGALEEV

Kazan State Medical University, 49 Butlerov St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012

Zagidullina G.T. — postgraduate student of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 1, tel. (843) 214-37-93, e-mail: ar2kur@mail.ru

Kurbangaleev A.I. — Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 1, tel. (843) 214-37-93, e-mail: ar2kur@mail.ru

This article is the literature observation concerning the imagination of common bile duct stones. Several diagnostic procedures compare in sensitivity and specificity in choledocholithiasis. MRI, CT and EUS show the best results before operation, cholangioscopy during operation. Recently russian authors use ERCP and IOCG as standart. Literature analysis shows that universal diagnostic program for choledocholithiasis is requre.

Key words: common bile duct, choledocholithiasis, cholangioscopy.

REFERENCES

1. Starkov Yu.G., Shishin K.V. Intraoperatsionnoe ul’trazvukovoe issledovanie v endoskopicheskoy khirurgii [Intraoperative ultrasound in endoscopic surgery]. Moscow: Russkiy put’, 2006. 120 p.
2. Balalykin A.S., Vasilenko Yu.V., Avaliani M.V. et al. Sovremennye printsipy endoskopicheskogo lecheniya kholedokholitiaza [Modern principles of endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis]. Operativnaya endoskopiya pishchevaritel’nogo trakta: Tezisy dokladov. Moscow, 1989. 59 p.
3. Korolev B.A., Pikovskiy D.L. Ekstrennaya khirurgiya zhelchnykh putey [Emergency surgery of the biliary tract]. Moscow, 1990. 97 p.
4. Shapoval’yants S.G., Fedorov E.D., Orlov S.Yu., Galkoza Z.VEndoscopic balloon dilatation of the sphincter of Oddi and modern alternative in the treatment of choledocholithiasis papillosphincterotomy. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya, 2001, no. 4, pp. 48-56.
5. Borisov A.E. Tactical endovideosurgery especially when choledocholithiasis. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya, 2000, no. 2, pp. 11-12 (in Russ.).
6. Gal’perin E.I., Kotovskiy A.E., Pozdeev I.V., Tupikin JI.B. Long-term results of endoscopic papillosphincterotomy. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii, 1997, vol. 2, pp. 132-135 (in Russ.).
7. Nesterenko Yu.A., Laptev V.V., Tskaev A.Yu. et al. Current problems in the diagnosis and treatment of patients mikroholedoholitiazom. Annaly khirurirgicheskoy gepatologii, 2007, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 62-68 (in Russ.).
8. Strekalovskiy V.P., Starkov Yu.G., Grigoryan R.S. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy choledocholithiasis and stricture at the terminal part of the common bile duct. Khirurgiya, 2000, no. 9, pp. 4-7 (in Russ.).
9. Paul-Andre C., Abbound B.A. et al. Prediction of Common Bile Duct Stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1996, vol. 44, no. 4.
10. Frederic Prat et al. Prediction of Common Bile Duct Stones by Noninvasive Tests. Annals of Surgery, 1999, vol. 229, no. 3.
11. Silvano loperfido, Giampaolo Angelini, Giorgio Benedetti, Fausto Chilovi et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1998, vol. 48, no. 1.
12. Bloom et al. Intravenous infusion cholangiography for investigation of the bile duct: a direct comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997, vol. 45, no. 3.
13. Bearcroft, Philip W; Lomas, David J. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. An International of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 1997, vol. 41(2), rr. 135-137.
14. Shinichi Kinami et al. Clinical evalution of 3D-CT cholangiography for preoperative examination in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of gatrotnterology, 1999.
15. Kwon AH et al. Preoperative assessment for laparoscopic cholecyctectomy: feasibility of using spiral computed tomography. Annals of Surgery, 1998, Vol. 3, R. 351-6.
16. Victor de Ledinghen, Robin Lecesne, Jean-Michel Raymond, Veronique Gence et al. Diagnisis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonanct cholangiography. A prospective controlled study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999, vol. 49, no. 1.
17. Thierry Montariol et al. Diagnosis of asymptomatic common bile duct stones: Preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography versus intraoperative cholangiography-a multicenter, prospective controlled study. Accepted for publication, 1998, vol. 12.
18. Pavone P., Laghi A., Catalano C., Panebianco V. et al. MRI of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. European Radiology, 1999, vol. 9, rr. 1513-1522.
19. Prat F., Amouyal G., Amouyal P., Pelletier G. et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct lithiasis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1996, vol. 44, no. 2.
20. Sugiyama M., Atomi Y. Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparative study with ultrasonography and computed tomography. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997, vol. 45(2), rr. 143-6.
21. Saburo Nakazawa. Recent advances in endoscopic ultrasonography. Journal of gatrotnterology, 2000, vol. 35, rr. 257-260.
22. Harbin W.P., Mueller P.R., Ferrucci J.T. Transhepatic cholangiography: complications and use patterns of the fine-needle technique: a multi-institutional survey. Radiology, 1980, vol. 135, pp. 15-20.
23. Iqbal Siddique et al. The role of choledochoscopy in the diagnosis and management of biliary tract diseases. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999, vol. 50, no. 1.
24. Sidney T., Bogardus Jr. et al. “Mother-Baby” Biliary Endocopy: The University of Chicago Experience. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 1996, vol. 91, no. 1.
25. Toshio Tsuyuguchi et al. Long-term follow-up after peroral cholangioscopy-directed litotripsy in patients with difficult bile duct stones, including Mirizzi syndrome: an analysis of risk factors predicting stone recurrence. Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, vol. 25, no. 7, rr. 2179-2185.
26. Carrol B.J. et al. Laparoscopic choledochoscopy: an effective approach to the common duct. J Laparoendosc Surg, 1992, vol. 2(1), pp. 15-21.
27. Tatsuo Yamakawa and et al. Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. J.Hepatobilliary Pancreat Surg, 2000, vol. 7, rr. 9-14.