B.A. ABUSUEVA¹, E.N. ISMAIL—ZADE¹, P.R. KAMCHATNOV², K.B. MANYSHEVA¹

¹Dagestan State Medical University, 1 Lenin Sq., Makhachkala, Russian Federation, 367000

²Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 1 Ostrovityanov Str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117997

 Abusueva B.A. ― Cand. Med. Sc., Head of the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, tel. +7-963-798-35-87, e-mail: burliyatabusueva@mail.ru

Kamchatnov P.R. ― D. Med. Sc., Professor of the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, tel. +7-910-428-19-06, e-mail: pavkam7@gmail.com

Ismail-Zade E.N. ― postgraduate student of the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, tel. +7-928-502-04-89, e-mail: elmira.asadova@mail.ru

Manysheva K.B. ― postgraduate student of the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, tel. +7-967-543-46-73, e-mail: manyshevakb@gmail.com

Cerebrovascular disorders is the main cause of mortality and disability in the modern world. Despite a variety of medical and surgical approaches to the treatment of patients with acute and chronic cerebral ischemia, their efficiency is not always sufficient, therefore, the use of the resources embedded in a human body is of special interest. One of them is the ischemic preconditioning (IPC) ― possibility to increase tolerance to ischemia after reversible cerebral ischemia, leading to structural tissue damage. Such conditions are observed, for example, during transient ischemic attacks. Data about the protective effect of IPC in patients with various forms of cerebrovascular disorders are analyzed in the article. The possibilities of clinical application of PKI is discussed.

Key words: ischemia, cerebral ischemia, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, ischemic preconditioning, treatment.

REFERENCES

1. Khochachka P., Somero Dzh. Strategiya biokhimicheskoy adaptatsii [The strategy of biochemical adaptation]. Moscow: Mir, 1977. 398 p.
2. Janoff A. Alterations in lysosomes (intracellular enzymes) during shock: Effects of preconditioning (tolerance) and protective drugs. Int. Anesthesiol. Clin, 1964, no. 2, rr. 251-269.
3. Siebert G., Gessner B., Klasser M. Energy supply of the central nervous system. Biblthca. Nutr. Dieta, 1986, no. 38, pp. 1-26.
4. Kitagawa K., Matsumoto M., Tagaya M. et al. ‘Ischemic tolerance’ phenomenon found in the brain. Brain Res, 1990, no. 528, rr. 21-4.
5. Kitagawa K., Matsumoto M., Oda T. et al. Free radical generation during brief period of cerebral ischemia may trigger delayed neuronal death. Neuroscience, 1990, no. 35, rr. 551-8.
6. Lin B., Globus MY.-T., Dietrich W. Differing neurochemical and morphological sequelae of global ischemia: Comparison of single- and multiple-insult paradigms. J. Neurochem, 1992, no. 59, rr. 2213-23.
7. Shcherbak N.S., Galagudza M.M., Barantsevich E.R. et al. A new way of modeling reversible global cerebral ischemia in rats. Byulleten’ eksperimental’noy biologii i meditsiny, 2011, vol. 152, no. 11, pp. 592-595 (in Russ.).
8. Glazier S., O’Rourke D., Graham D., Welsh F. Induction of ischemic tolerance following brief focal ischemia in rat brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab, 1994, no. 14, R. 545-53.
9. Shmonin A.A., Panov I.Yu., Simanenkova A.V. et al. Endogenous neuroprotection in cerebral ischemia: erythropoietin, pre- and post-conditioning. Annaly klinicheskoy i eksperimental’noy nevrologii, 2010, no. 3, pp. 29-35 (in Russ.).
10. Sommer C. Ischemic Preconditioning: Postischemic Structural Changes in the Brain. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, 2008, no. 67 (2), R. 85-92.
11. Shcherbak N.S., Galagudza M.M., Barantsevich E.R. et al. The activity of succinate dehydrogenase in the neocortex and hippocampus of Mongolian gerbils in ischemic and reperfusion injury of the brain. Byulleten’ eksperimental’noy biologii i meditsiny, 2013, no. 1, pp. 17-20 (in Russ.).
12. Shcherbak N.S., Galagudza M.M., Barantsevich E.R. et al. Morphofunctional changes of pyramidal neurons of various fields of the hippocampus in ischemic post-conditioning. Morfologiya, 2013, no. 3, pp. 7-13 (in Russ.).
13. Weih M., Kallenberg K., Bergk A. et al. Attenuated stroke severity after prodromal TIA: a role for ischemic tolerance in the brain? Stroke, 1999, no. 30 (9), rr. 1851-4.
14. Moncayo J., de Freitas G., Bogousslavsky J. et al. Do transient ischemic attacks have a neuroprotective effect?. Neurology, 2000, no. 54 (11), rr. 2089-94.
15. Arboix A., Cabeza N., García-Eroles L. et al. Relevance of transient ischemic attack to early neurological recovery after nonlacunar ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc. Dis, 2004, no. (4), rr. 304-11.
16. Weber R., Diener H., Weimar C. German Stroke Study Collaboration. Why do acute ischemic stroke patients with a preceding transient ischemic attack present with less severe strokes? Insights from the German Stroke Study. Eur. Neurol, 2011, no. (5), rr. 265-70.
17. Wegener S., Gottschalk B., Jovanovic V. et al. MRI in Acute Stroke Study Group of the German Competence Network Stroke. Transient ischemic attacks before ischemic stroke: preconditioning the human brain? A multicenter magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke, 2004, no. (3), rr. 616-21.
18. Hess D., Hoda N., Bhatia K. Remote Limb Perconditioning and Postconditioning. Will It Translate Into a Promising Treatment for Acute Stroke? Stroke, 2013, no. 44, rr. 1191-1197.
19. Batysheva T.T., Kamchatnov P.R., Pivovarchik E.M., Zaytsev K.A. et al. The first experience of using external counterpulsation for restorative treatment of patients who underwent ischemic stroke. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova, 2009, no. 6, pp. 44-47 (in Russ.).
20. Hausenloy D.J., Candilio L., Evans R. et al. Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery. N. Engl. J. Med, 2015, no. 373, rr. 1408-17.
21. Hong D., Lee E., Kim H. et al. Does remote ischaemic preconditioning with postconditioning improve clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery? Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning with Postconditioning Outcome Trial. Eur. Heart J, 2014, no. 35, rr. 176-83.
22. Koch S., Katsnelson M., Dong C., Perez-Pinzon M. Remote ischemic limb preconditioning after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a phase Ib study of safety and feasibility. Stroke, 2011, no. 42, rr. 1387-1391.
23. Gonzalez N., Hamilton R., Bilgin-Freiert A. et al. Cerebral hemodynamic and metabolic effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acta Neurochir. Suppl, 2013, no. 115, rr. 193-198.
24. Hougaard K., Hjort N., Zeidler D. et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning as an adunct therapy to thrombolysis inpatients with acute ischemic stroke: a randomized trial. Stroke, 2014, no. 45 (1), rr. 159-67
25. Meng R., Asmaro K., Meng L. et al. Upper limb ischemic preconditioning prevents recurrent stroke in intracranial arterial stenosis. Neurology, 2012, no. 18, rr. 1853-61.
26. Meng R., Ding Y., Asmaro K. et al. Ischemic Conditioning Is Safe and Effective for Octo- and Nonagenarians in Stroke Prevention and Treatment. Neurotherapeutics, 2015, no. 3, rr. 667-77.