pm mfvt1
    • Main page
      • About journal
      • Articles. Working with contents
      • Editor-in-chief
      • Editorial Council
      • Editorial Board


      • For authors
      • Standards for formatting information
      • Reviewing
      • Politics editorial board
      • Ethics of journal publications


      • For advertisers
      • Subscription
      • About the Publishing House
      • Contact us
  • Evaluation of the quality of life of women after robot-assisted radical gynecological surgeries in reproductive age

    Редактор | 2025, Articles based on dissertstions, Practical medicine part 23 №6. 2025 | 23 декабря, 2025

    D.I. NIZOVA, T.A. GLEBOV, A.A. POPOV, I.D. KLYUSHNIKOV

     Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology named after Acad. V.I. Krasnopolsky, Moscow

    Contact details:

    Nizova D.I. — post-graduate student of the Department of Operative Gynecology with Oncogynecology and day hospital

    Address: 22a Pokrovka St., 101000 Moscow, Russian Federation, tel.: +7-965-684-45-45, e-mail: dasha.389870@yandex.ru

     The purpose — to assess the quality of life of women of reproductive age who underwent hysterectomy using robot-assisted laparoscopy using a questionnaire, in order to develop an optimal personalized algorithm for corrective therapy in the postoperative period.

    Material and methods. The retrospective study included 90 patients who underwent radical surgery in reproductive age with robot-assisted laparoscopy from 2018 to 2023. The quality of life of these patients in the delayed period was analyzed using a questionnaire based on Greene Scale, WHO Quality of Life Questionnaire (brief) (WHOQOL-26), and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).

    Results. According to the Greene Scale, climacteric syndrome was most often observed in patients who underwent hysterectomy with appendages on both sides (group III) (93.3%). The patients most often noted no signs of climacteric syndrome after hysterectomy with one of the appendages (70%). According to the quality-of-life questionnaire developed by WHO (WHOQOL-26), various disorders associated with the volume of surgical treatment were not noted in certain types of organ-sparing treatment. According to the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), a pronounced degree of sexual dysfunction was observed in patients who underwent hysterectomy with appendages on both sides, and minimal dysfunction was observed in patients after hysterectomy with one of the appendages.

    Conclusion. Practicing gynecologists must consider the impact of various degrees of treatment on subsequent quality of life. This concept is multifaceted and encompasses not only physical but also psychological well-being. The negative impact on quality-of-life stems not only from the radical nature of surgical treatment, but also the presence and severity of menopausal disorders.

    Key words: hysterectomy, extirpation of the uterus, posthysterectomy syndrome, robotic surgery.

    REFERENCES

    1. Yerkenova S.E., Beysembayeva M.K., Murtayeva D.A., Nurmambetova D.A., Gusenova R.I., Kemelbekova A.A. et al. The state of the ovaries after surgical interventions on the pelvic organs in women of reproductive age. Vestnik KazNMU, 2014, no. 3-3 (in Russ.).
    2. Shabalova O.V., Yureneva S.V., Yermakova E.I., Khokhlova S.V., Gardanova Zh.R., Yakushevskaya O.V. Surgical menopause as a risk factor for the early development of comorbid conditions in women of reproductive age. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya, 2021, no. 6, pp. 54–59 (in Russ.).
    3. Radynova S.B., Kenyaykina A.G., Lodyreva M.S., Gorbunova K.A. Obzor patogeneticheskikh aspektov formirovaniya postgisterektomicheskogo sindroma. Colloquium-journal, 2019, no. 6 (30) (in Russ.).
    4. Lycke K.D., Kahlert J., Damgaard R., Mogensen O., Hammer A. Trends in hysterectomy incidence rates during 2000-2015 in Denmark: shifting from abdominal to minimally invasive surgical procedures. Clin. Epidemiol, 2021, vol. 13, pp. 407–416.
    5. Frolova N.I., Belokrinitskaya T.E., Barkan T.M., Golygin E.V., Liga V.F., Pletneva V.A. et al. Medical and social characteristics of women of young childbearing age who underwent hysterectomy. Acta Biomed. Sci, 2018, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 15–20 (in Russ.).
    6. Dietl J., Wischhusen J., Häusler S.F.M. The post- reproductive fallopian tube: better removed? Human Re- production, 2011, vol. 26 (11), pp. 2918–2924.
    7. Stewart E.A., Shuster L.T., Rocca W.A. Reassessing Hyster-ectomy. Minnesota Medicine, 2012, vol. 95 (3), p. 36.
    8. Moorman P.G., Myers E.R., Schildkraut J.M., Iversen E.S., Wang F., Warren N. Effect of hysterectomy with ovarian preservation on ovarian function. Obstet. Gynecol, 2011, vol. 118 (6), pp. 1271–1279.
    9. Vysotskiy M.M., Bezhenar′ V.F. Extent of hysterectomy in benign uterine pathology. The role of concomitant adnexectomy (literature review). Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii, 2015, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 72–75 (in Russ.).
    10. Mochalova M.N., Sidorkina A.G., Mudrov V.A. Postpartum hemorrhage as a medical and social problem. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa, 2023, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 41–46 (in Russ.).
    11. Dobrokhotova Yu.E., Il′ina I.Yu. Sindrom postgisterektomii. Diagnostika i lecheniye [Posthysterectomy syndrome. Diagnosis and treatment]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2017. 208 p.
    12. Thakar R. Is the uterus a sexual organ? Sexual function following hysterectomy. Sex Med. Rev, 2015, vol. 3, pp. 264–278.
    13. Gayvoronskikh D.I., Koval′ A.A., Skvortsov V.G. Posthysterectomy syndrome: clinical manifestations and methods of their correction. Vestnik rossiyskoy voyenno-meditsinskoy akademii, 2012, no. 4, pp. 120–122 (in Russ.).
    14. Huang Y., Wu M., Wu C., Zhu Q., Wu T., Zhu X. et al. Effect of hysterectomy on ovarian function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Ovarian Res, 2023, vol. 16 (1), p. 35.
    15. Wilson L., Pandeya N., Byles J., Mishra G. Hysterectomy and incidence of depressive symptoms in midlife women: the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci, 2018, vol. 27 (4), pp. 381–392.
    16. Darwish M., Atlantis E., Mohamed-Taysir T. Psychological outcomes after hysterectomy for benign conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol, 2014, vol. 174, pp. 5–19.
    17. Wang Y., Ying X. Sexual function after total laparoscopic hysterectomy or transabdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine disorders: a retrospective cohort. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res, 2020, vol. 53 (3), p. e9058.
    18. Kokcu A., Kurtoglu E., Bildircin D., Celik H., Kaya A., Alper T. Does surgical menopause affect sexual performance differently from natural menopause? J. Sex Med, 2015, vol. 12 (6), pp. 1407–1414.
    19. Dedden S.J., Werner M.A., Steinweg J., Lissenberg-Witte B.I., Huirne J.A.F., Geomini P.M.A.J., Maas J.W.M. Hysterectomy and sexual function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Sex Med, 2023, vol. 20 (4), pp. 447–466.
    20. Zhao Q., Yan C., Dan M., Jia H. Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for urinary retention after hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, vol. 100 (22). e26064.

    Метки: 2025, A.A. POPOV, D.I. NIZOVA, extirpation of the uterus, hysterectomy, I.D. KLYUSHNIKOV, posthysterectomy syndrome, Practical medicine part 23 №6. 2025, robotic surgery, T.A. GLEBOV

    ‹ Coagulation disorders in different periods of COVID-19 infection in children with inflammatory bowel diseases Predictors of kidney damage in HIV-infected patients according to autopsy data ›
    • rus Версия на русском языке


      usa English version site


      Find loupe

      

    • PARTNERS

      пов  logonew
    «Для
    Practical medicine. Scientific and practical reviewed medical journal
    All rights reserved ©