I.I. KHAMZIN¹, R.Sh. SHAIMARDANOV², T.A. GOSTYAEVA¹, G.R. ZAKIROVA¹, R.F. GUBAEV¹, I.I. NURIEV¹

¹Municipal Clinical Hospital №7, 54 Chuikov Str., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420103

²Kazan State Medical Academy, 36 Butlerov Str., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012

Khamzin I.I. ― Head of Endoscopy Department, tel. +7-917-275-69-36, e-mail: endohamzin@mail.ru

Shaimardanov R.Sh. ― Cand. Med. Sc., Professor of the Surgery Department, tel. +7-917-857-11-76, e-mail: gubaevrus@mail.ru

Gostyaeva T.A. ― endoscopist, tel. +7-917-253-28-11, e-mail: tamgost@yandex.ru

Zakirova G.R. ― Cand. Med. Sc., endoscopist, tel. +7-927-407-24-16, e-mail: guzeliya-x@mail.ru

Gubaev R.F. ― Head of Surgery Department №1, tel. +7-919-642-98-07, e-mail: gubaevrus@mail.ru

Nuriev I.I. ― surgeon, tel. +7-987-227-11-52, e-mail: nurievmd@gmail.com

The article presents results of 1114 endoscopic procedures in 858 patients with non-neoplastic diseases of hepatobiliary area. Indications for different ways of transpappilar and intraduct procedures (endoscopic papillosphincterotomy, lithotripsy, lithoextraction, baloon dilatation, nasobiliary stenting) were formulated. Complications after endoscopic procedures and their reasons were researched. Different postoperative complications (endoscopic papillosphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis, bleeding, duodenum perforation) occurred in 33 (6.5%) patients, with general mortality of 0.2% and mortality after EPST of 0.55%.

Key words: endoscopic procedures, non-neoplastic diseases, hepatobiliar area, post-operative complications.

REFERENCES

1. Maystrenko N.A., Stukalo V.V. Kholedokholitiaz [Resection of the liver]. Saint Petersburg: ELBI-SP (b), 2000. 288 p.
2. Khirurgiya pecheni i zhelchnykh putey, pod red. M.A. Nartaylakova [Operations on the liver. Guide for surgeons]. Rostov on Don: Feniks, 2007. 400 p.
3. Gal’perin E.I., Vetshev P.S. Rukovodstvo po khirurgii zhelchnykh putey [Comprehensive review of post-liver resection surgical complications and a new universal classification andgrading system]. Moscow: Izdatel’skiy dom Vidar, 2006. 568 p.
4. Kuz’min-Krutetskiy M.I. Carrier-bound fibrin sealant compared to oxidized cellulose application after liver resection. Sb. materialov konf. VII Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. “Aktual’nye voprosy endoskopii. 2016 g.” 24-25 March, 2016. Saint Petersburg. Pp. 245-246.
5. Kotovskiy A.E., Dyuzheva T.G., Nefedtsova V.A. Taktika endoskopicheskogo lecheniya bol’nykh mekhanicheskoy zheltukhoy metodom stentirovaniya zhelchny protokov [Liver regeneration after liver resection: Clinical aspects and correlation with infective complications]. Sb. materialov konf. VII Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. “Aktual’nye voprosy endoskopii. 2016 g.” 24-25 March, 2016. Saint Petersburg. Pp. 242-244.
6. Korolev M.P., Fedotov L.E. Nestandartnyy kholelitiaz v sochetanii s yatrogennoy strikturoy obshchego zhelchnogo protoka i parapillyarnogo divertikula [Risk factors for biliary complications after liver resection surgery]. Sb. materialov konf. VII Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. “Aktual’nye voprosy endoskopii. 2016 g.” 24-25 March, 2016. Saint Petersburg. Pp. 236-237.
7. Balalykin A.S., Kurdo S.A., Biryukov A.Yu. K probleme nestandartnykh situatsiy v endoskopicheskoy vnutriprosvetnoy khirurgii pankreatobiliarnoy sistemy [Postoperative biliary complications in liver resections]. Sb. materialov konf. VII Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. “Aktual’nye voprosy endoskopii. 2016 g.” 24-25 March, 2016. Saint Petersburg. P. 209.
8. Sayfutdinov I.M., Slavin L.E. Bile leakage as a cause of postoperative peritonitis. Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2015, no. 6 (91), pp. 29-33 (in Russ.).
9. Kavaguchi Y., Ogawa M., Omata F. et al. Randomizes controlled trial of pancreatic stenting to prevent pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. World J. Gastroenterol, 2012, vol. 18, no. 14, pp. 1635-1641.
10. Lazaraki G. Prevention of ERCP pancreatitis: an overview. Ann. Gastroenterol, 2008, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 27-38.
11. Masci E., Mariani A., Curioni S., Testoni P.A. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: meta-analysis. Endoscopy, 2003, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 830-834.