pm mfvt1
    • Main page
      • About journal
      • Articles. Working with contents
      • Editor-in-chief
      • Editorial Council
      • Editorial Board


      • For authors
      • Standards for formatting information
      • Reviewing
      • Politics editorial board
      • Ethics of journal publications


      • For advertisers
      • Subscription
      • About the Publishing House
      • Contact us
  • Electronic assistant for remote estimation of quality of life with EQ-5D-3L questionnaire

    Редактор | 2024, Original articles, Practical medicine part 22 №2. 2024 | 6 апреля, 2024

    A.A. GARANIN, A.O. RUBANENKO, YU.A. TRUSOV

     Samara State Medical University, Samara

     Contact details:

    Garanin A.A. — PhD (Medicine), Director of Scientific and Practical Centre for remote medicine

    Address: 165B Karl Marx Avenue, Russian Federation, Samara, 443079, tel.: +7 (846) 374-91-00, e-mail: a.a.garanin@samsmu.ru

    Nowadays estimation of quality of life in patients with different diseases is one of the most important indicators of treatment effectiveness. There is literature data that reveals association between quality of life and adherence to treatment, which may result in increasing therapy effectiveness. In real clinical practice a doctor needs contemporary instruments that can estimate the quality of life of the patients during traditional consultation and also during remote consultation and telemonitoring. One of the most popular instruments for estimation of quality of life is EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. In Samara State Medical University an electronic assistant was developed for remote estimation of quality of life with EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. An undeniable benefit of this assistant is simplicity, visibility and usability in traditional and remote medical consultations. After implementation of abovementioned electronic assistant in real clinical practice, a doctor can estimate the quality of life of a patient independently and also by means of remote medicine centres, where this data will be accumulated.

    Key words: quality of life, EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, telemedicine, electronic assistant, telemonitoring.

    REFERENCES

    1. Haraldstad K., Wahl A., Andenæs R. et al. LIVSFORSK network. A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences. Qual. Life Res, 2019, vol. 28 (10), pp. 2641–2650. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02214-9
    2. Nunes M.I. The relationship between quality of life and adherence to treatment. Curr. Hypertens. Rep, 2001, vol. 3 (6), pp. 462–465. DOI: 10.1007/s11906-001-0007-9
    3. Souza A.C., Borges J.W., Moreira T.M. Quality of life and treatment adherence in hypertensive patients: systematic review with meta-analysis. Rev. Saude Publica, 2016, vol. 50, p. 71. DOI: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006415
    4. Ágh T., Dömötör P., Bártfai Z., Inotai A., Fujsz E., Mészáros Á. Relationship between medication adherence and health-related quality of life in subjects with COPD: a systematic review. Respir. Care, 2015, vol. 60 (2), pp. 297–303. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.03123
    5. García-Llana H., Remor E., Del Peso G., Selgas R. The role of depression, anxiety, stress and adherence to treatment in dialysis patients health-related quality of life: a systematic review of the literature. Nefrologia, 2014, vol. 34 (5), pp. 637–657. DOI: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2014.Jun.11959
    6. Kai J.Y., Xu Y., Li D.L., Zhou M., Wang P., Pan C.W. Impact of major age-related eye disorders on health-related quality of life assessed by EQ-5D: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol, 2023, vol. 261 (9), pp. 2455–2463. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-06034-z
    7. Jeong J.H., Jo M.W., Chin D.K., Son W.S., Ock M., Lee J.K. Validation of the European quality of life-5 dimensions, 3-level version (EQ-5D-3L) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture and comparing their health-related quality of life with that of the general population in Korea. Korean J. Neurotrauma, 2022, vol. 18 (1), pp. 64–74. DOI: 10.13004/kjnt.2022.18.e19
    8. Fang H., Farooq U., Wang D., Yu F., Younus M.I., Guo X. Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-3L for Kashin-Beck disease in China. Springerplus, 2016, vol. 5 (1), pp. 1924. DOI:10.1186/s40064-016-3613-3
    9. Zare F., Ameri H., Madadizadeh F., Aghaei M.R. Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D-3L (a generic preference-based instrument used for calculating quality-adjusted life -years) for patients with type 2 diabetes in Iran. Diabetes Metab. Syndr, 2021, vol. 15 (1), pp. 319–324. DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.01.009
    10. Mahesh P.K.B., Gunathunga M.W., Jayasinghe S., Arnold S.M., Senanayake S., Senanayake C. et al. Construct validity and reliability of EQ-5D-3L for stroke survivors in a lower middle income setting. Ceylon Med. J, 2019, vol. 64 (2), pp. 52–58. DOI: 10.4038/cmj.v64i2.8891
    11. Lin D.Y., Cheok T.S., Samson A.J., Kaambwa B., Brown B., Wilson C et al. A longitudinal validation of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS stand-alone component utilising the Oxford Hip Score in the Australian hip arthroplasty population. J. Patient Rep. Outcomes, 2022, vol. 6 (1), p. 71. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00482-7
    12. Jankowska A., Młyńczak K., Golicki D. Validity of EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life questionnaire in self-reported diabetes: evidence from a general population survey. Health Qual. Life Outcomes, 2021, vol. 19 (1), p. 138. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01780-2
    13. Akulova A.I., Gaydukova I.Z., Rebrov A.P. Validatsiya versii 5l oprosnika EQ-5D v Rossii. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya, 2018, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 351–355 (in Russ.).
    14. Hall R.K., Cary M.P. Jr, Washington T.R., Colón-Emeric C.S. Quality of life in older adults receiving hemodialysis: a qualitative study. Qual. Life Res, 2020, vol. 29 (3), pp. 655–663. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02349-9
    15. Băjenaru L., Balog A., Dobre C., Drăghici R., Prada G.I. Latent profile analysis for quality of life in older patients. BMC Geriatr, 2022, vol. 22 (1), p. 848. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03518-1
    16. Vanleerberghe P., De Witte N., Claes C., Schalock R.L., Verté D. The quality of life of older people aging in place: a literature review. Qual. Life Res, 2017, vol. 26 (11), pp. 2899–2907. DOI:10.1007/s11136-017-1651-0
    17. Kalemikerakis I., Evaggelakou A., Kavga A., Vastardi M., Konstantinidis T., Govina O. Diagnosis, treatment and quality of life in patients with cancer-related lymphedema. J. BUON, 2021, vol. 26 (5), pp. 1735–1741.
    18. Suarez-Almazor M., Pinnix C., Bhoo-Pathy N., Lu Q., Sedhom R., Parikh R.B. Quality of life in cancer care. Med, 2021, vol. 2 (8), pp. 885–888. DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.07.005
    19. Licu M., Ionescu C.G., Paun S. Quality of life in cancer patients: the modern psycho-oncologic approach for Romania-a review. Curr. Oncol, 2023, vol. 30 (7), pp. 6964–6975. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070504
    20. Guerra-Martín M.D., Casado-Espinosa M.D.R., Gavira-López Y., Holgado-Castro C., López-Latorre I., Borrallo-Riego Á. Quality of life in caregivers of cancer patients: a literature review. Int. J. Environ Res. Public Health, 2023, vol. 20 (2), p. 1570. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021570

    Метки: 2024, A.A. GARANIN, A.O. RUBANENKO, electronic assistant, EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, Practical medicine part 22 №2. 2024, quality of life, telemedicine, telemonitoring, YU.A. TRUSOV

    ‹ Natriuretic peptide in obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease at a young age Influence of comorbid metabolic syndrome on disorders of cardiorespiratory regulation in patients with non-severe community-acquired pneumonia ›
    • rus Версия на русском языке


      usa English version site


      Find loupe

      

    • PARTNERS

      пов  logonew
    «Для
    Practical medicine. Scientific and practical reviewed medical journal
    All rights reserved ©