E.R. MEKHTIEVA, I.I. MUSIN, R.M. ZAINULLINA, N.A. MOUFAZALOVA, A.G. IMELBAEVA, K.N. YASCHUK

Bashkir State Medical University, 3 Lenin Str., Ufa, Russian Federation, 450008

Mekhtieva E.R. ― Assistant of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology №2, e-mail: elvirochka-azn@mail.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8834-7951

Musin I.I. ― PhD (medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology №2, e-mail: ilnur-musin@yandex.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5520-5845

Zainullina R.M. ― PhD (medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology №2, tel. (347) 264-96-50, e-mail: raisa.bsmu@gmail.com, ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6323-4443

Mufazalova N.A. ― D. Sc. (medicine), Professor of the Department of Pharmacology №1 with a course in clinical pharmacology, e-mail: mufazalovanatalya@yandex.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0656-3459

Imelbaeva A.G. ― Assistant of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology №2, tel. (347) 264-96-50, e-mail: albina321093@rambler.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0558-1364

Yaschuk K.N. ― 2^nd year student of Pediatric Faculty, e-mail: yashhukk@bk.ru

In recent decades, the problem of genital prolapse and prolapse in women is relevant because of its prevalence and significant negative impact on the quality of life of women. Pelvic organ prolapse treatment is usually surgical, aimed at restoring anatomy and structures to support the pelvic organs. Currently, in addition to the classic operations to restore the pelvic floor began to use a variety of additional materials.

Purpose ― to analyze various methods of pelvic floor surgical reconstruction with and without biological and synthetic materials, according to POP–q classification.

Material and methods. The analysis of modern sources on the problem of omission and loss of genitals in women, the use of different types of biological and synthetic materials in reconstructive operations of the pelvic floor.

Results. According to the literature data, studies related to the treatment of pelvic prolapse show significant variations in surgical correction. As well as the criteria for the effectiveness of pelvic floor recovery are not only improving the anatomical outcome, but also the overall satisfaction of patients.

The analysis showed that the prolapses of the anterior and posterior parts of the vagina (II – III art.) mainly use biological materials to reduce complications, and the loss of the apical Department (IV art.) standard is sacropenia with the use of synthetic meshes.

Conclusion. Further research should be aimed at finding the ideal material for surgical correction of the pelvic floor muscles, taking into account their reproductive potential.

Key words: prolapse of pelvic organs, synthetic mesh materials, allografts, xenografts.

(For citation: Mekhtieva E.R., Musin I.I., Zainullina R.M.,  Mufazalova N.A., Imelbaeva A.G., Yaschuk K.N. Comparative evaluation of the use of biological and synthetic materials for the prolapse of pelvic organs. Practical Medicine. 2018)

REFERENCES

1. Yashchuk A.G., Musin I.I., Popova E.M. et al. Surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women with the use of collagen material. Ehksperimentalʹnaya i klinicheskaya urologiya, 2015, no. 4, pp. 124-126 (in Russ.).
2. Bradley C.S., Nygaard I.E. Vaginal wall descensus and pelvic floor symptoms in older women. Obstet. Gynecol, 2005, 106, pp. 759-66.
3. Rortveit G., Brown J.S., Thom D.H. et al. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a population based, racially diverse cohort. Obstet. Gynecol, 2007, 109, pp. 1396-403.
4. Younger A., Rac G., Quentin C. et al. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in academic female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery urology practice in the setting of the Food and Drug Administration public health notifications. Urology, 2016,91, pp. 46-50.
5. Buyanova S.N., Savelʹev S.V., Fedorov A.A. The role of DST in the pathogenesis of genital prolapse. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa, 2008, spec. release, pp. 8-11 (in Russ.).
6. Bezhenarʹ V.F. Complications arising from the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse using the Prolift system. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney, 2009, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 25-26 (in Russ.).
7. Gutikova L.V. Genital prolapse: current state of the problem. Zhurnal Grodnenskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta, 2012, no. 1 (37), pp. 86-89 (in Russ.).
8. Haylen B.T., de Ridder D., Freeman R.M. et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol. Urodyn, 2010, 29, pp. 4-20.
9. Bump R.C., Mattiasson A., Bø K. et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 1996, 175, pp. 10-17.
10. Naftulovich R.A., Yashchuk A.G., Maslennikov A.V., Alakaeva D.R. Features of family history in patients with prolapse and prolapse of the pelvic organs. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa, 2013, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 30-36 (in Russ.).
11. Maher C., Feiner B., Baessler K. et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev, 2013, 4, CD004014.
12. Nygaard I., Bradley C., Brandt D. Women’s Health Initiative. Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet. Gynecol, 2004, 104, pp. 489-97.
13. Haylen B.T., Freeman R.M., Swift S.E. et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int. Urogynecol. J, 2011, 22, pp. 3-15.
14. Bezhenarʹ V.F. Effective clinical experience in the use of suburethral slings in the treatment of urinary incontinence in women . Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney, 2012, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 30-37 (in Russ.).
15. Olsen A.L., Smith V.J., Bergstrom J.O. et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet. Gynecol, 1997, 89, pp. 501-624.
16. Weber A.M., Walters M.D., Piedmonte M.R., Ballard L.A. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol., 2001;185:1299–306.

17. Kasyan G.R., Kayfadzhyan M.M., Malkhasyan V.A., Pushkarʹ D.Yu. Effect of synthetic materials used to treat genital prolapse on the function of the lower urinary tract. Urologiya, 2011, no, 5, pp. 20-23 (in Russ.).
18. Ishchenko A.I., Aleksandrov L.S., Gorbenko O.Yu. et al. The use of «reinforced» aponeurotic flap in the surgical correction and for the prevention of genital prolapse in women with combined gynecological pathology. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa, 2011, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 55-60 (in Russ.).
19. Gutikova L.V., But-Gusaim L.S., Birkos V.A. et al. Use of alloprosthetics for surgical correction of prolapse and prolapse of the internal genital organs. Reproduktivnoe zdorovʹe v Belarusi, 2010, no. 5, pp. 33-39 (in Russ.).
20. Oversand S.H., Staff A.C., Spydslaug A.E. et al. Long-term follow-up after native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapsed. Int. Urogynecol. J, 2014, 25, pp. 81-9.
21. Wu J.M., Dieter A.A., Pate V. et al. Cumulative incidence of a subsequent surgery after stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse procedure. Obstet. Gynecol, 2017, 129, pp. 1124-30.
22. Kamoeva S.V. New technologies for using mesh implants in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in women. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa, 2012, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 64-69 (in Russ.).
23. Albo M.E., Richter H.E., Brubaker L. et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N. Engl. J. Med, 2007, 356, pp. 2143-55.
24. Krasnopolʹskiy V.I., Popov A.A. Vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy (prolift method) — a new look at the surgery of prolapse and prolapse of the internal genital organs. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya, 2007, no. 2, pp. 251-55 (in Russ.).
25. Amid P.K. Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia, 1997, 1, pp. 15-21.
26. Liang R., Knight K., Abramowitch S. et al. Exploring the basic science of prolapse meshes. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol, 2016, 28, pp. 413-19.
27. Cobb W.S., Peindl R.M., Zerey M. et al. Mesh terminology 101. Hernia, 2009, 13, pp. 1-6.
28. El-Nazer M.A., Gomaa I.A., Ismail Madkour W.A. et al. Anterior colporrhaphy versus repair with mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a comparative clinical study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet, 2012, 286, pp. 965-72.
29. Kapoor D.S., Nemcova M., Pantazis K. et al. Reoperation rate for traditional anterior vaginal repair: analysis of 207 cases with a median 4-year follow-up. Int. Urogynecol. J, 2010, 21, pp. 27-31.
30. Maher C., Feiner B., Baessler K. et al. Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapsed. Cochrane Database of Syst. Rev, 2016, 11, CD004014.
31. Glazener C.M., Breeman S., Elders A. et al. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). Lancet, 2017, 389, pp. 381-92.
32. Walter A.J., Morse A.N., Leslie K.O. et al. Changes in tensile strength of cadaveric fascia lata in a rabbit vagina model. J. Urol, 2003, 169, pp. 1907-10.
33. Gandhi S., Goldberg R.P., Kwon C. et al. A prospective randomized trial using solvent dehydrated fascia lata for the prevention of recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapsed. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 2005, 192, pp. 1649-54.
34. Meschia M., Pifarotti P., Bernasconi F. et al. Porcine skin collagen implants to prevent anterior vaginal wall prolapse recurrence: a multicenter, randomized study. J. Urol, 2007, 177, pp. 192-5.
35. Menefee S.A., Dyer K.Y., Lukacz E.S. et al. Colporrhaphy compared with mesh or graft-reinforced vaginal paravaginal repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol, 2011, 118, pp. 1337-44.
36. Cao T.T., Sun X.L., Wang S.Y. et al. Porcine small intestinal submucosa mesh for treatment of pelvic organ prolapsed. Chin. Med. J, 2016, 129, pp. 2603-9.
37. Mourtialon P., Letouzey V., Eglin G. et al. Transischioanal trans-sacrospinous ligament rectocele repair with polypropylene mesh: a prospective study with assessment of rectoanal function. Int. Urogynecol. J, 2013, 24, pp. 81-9.
38. Paraiso M.F., Barber M.D., Muir T.W., Walters M.D. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 2006, 195, pp. 1762-71.
39. Sung V.W., Rardin C.R., Raker C.A. et al. Porcine subintestinal submucosal graft augmentation for rectocele repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol, 2012, 119, pp. 125-33.
40. Rooney K., Kenton K., Mueller E.R. et al. Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapsed. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 2006, 195, pp. 1837-40.

41. Abdelmonem A.M. Vaginal length and incidence of dyspareunia after total abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol, 2010, 151, pp. 190-2.
42. Tate S.B., Blackwell L., Lorenz D.J. et al. Randomized trial of fascia lata and polypropylene mesh for abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 5-year follow-up. Int. Urogynecol. J, 2011, 22, pp. 137-43.
43. Gutman R.E., Nosti P.A., Sokol A.I. et al. Three-year outcomes of vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Gynecol, 2013, 122, pp. 770-7.
44. Svabik K., Martan A., Masata J. et al. Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy in patients with levator ani avulsion: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol, 2014, 43, pp. 365-71.