pm mfvt1
    • Main page
      • About journal
      • Articles. Working with contents
      • Editor-in-chief
      • Editorial Council
      • Editorial Board


      • For authors
      • Standards for formatting information
      • Reviewing
      • Politics editorial board
      • Ethics of journal publications


      • For advertisers
      • Subscription
      • About the Publishing House
      • Contact us
  • Comparative evaluation of postnatal growth of premature babies using different regulations and standards

    Редактор | 2018, Original articles, Practical medicine part 16 №8 Pediatrics (2018) | 3 ноября, 2018

    N.L. CHERNAYA¹, G.S. MASKOVA¹, V.M. GANUZIN¹, E.A. ERMOLINA²

    ¹Yaroslavl State Medical University of the MH of RF, 5 Revolyutsionnaya Str., Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, 150000

    ²Regional Perinatal Center, 31v Tutaevskoe highway, Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, 150042

     Chernaya N.L. – D. Sc. (medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Outpatient Pediatrics, tel. (485) 235-66-92, e-mail: nlch@mail.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2647-0679

    Maskova G.S. – PhD (medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Outpatient Pediatrics, tel. (485) 235-66-92, e-mail: maskovags@mail.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8336-7750

    Ganuzin V.M. – PhD (medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Outpatient Pediatrics, tel. (485) 235-66-92, e-mail: vganuzin@rambler.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7436-6182

    Ermolina E.A. – Head of the Outpatient Department for young children, tel. (485) 278-91-50, e-mail: lerm0402@rambler.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3010-4727

    Objective: a comparative assessment of the dynamics of physical development (PD) of children born from the 26th to the 34th week of gestation using different standards and growth regulations of premature babies.

    Materials and methods: A prospective observation of the growth dynamics of 66 premature babies during 12 months of their postnatal development was conducted. The risk factor of preterm infants from birth to the 50th week of gestational age was estimated using nomograms proposed by Fenton TR (2013); from the 51st week of gestational age and up to 12 months — according to WHO standards for full-term babies, taking into account the “adjusted” age using the WHO Anthro software. In addition, a comparative assessment of the growth of premature babies from birth to the 64th week of postmenstrual age was made using postnatal growth standards proposed in the INTERGROWTH-21st project.

    Results: PD of premature babies, determined by different standards, was characterized by disharmony during the first year of life. We found significant differences in the estimated PD of children who have been born prematurely, and estimation was performed using different methods.

    Conclusion: Transition to a unified system for assessing the growth of premature babies is necessary.

    Key words: children, premature, physical development, assessment methods.

    (For citation: Chernaya N.L., Maskova G.S., Ganuzin V.M., Ermolina E.A. Comparative evaluation of postnatal growth of premature babies using different regulations and standards. Practical Medicine. 2018)

    REFERENCES

    1. Ganuzin V.M., Chernaya N.L., Maskova G.S. et al. Features of nutrition and physical development of children born prematurely. Voprosy detskoy dietologii, 2017, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 48 (in Russ.).
    2. Fenton T.R. A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Bendas chart updated with resent data a new Garmat DMP. Pediatr, 2003, vol. 16, pp. 3-13.
    3. Fenton T.R., Kim T.R. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infant. BMC. Pediatrics, 2013, pp. 13-59.
    4. Diagrammy rosta Fenton Preterm [Fenton Preterm growth charts], available at: https://www.ucalgary.ca/fenton/
    5. WHO Child Growth Standards. Normy rosta detey VOZ (2006) [WHO Child Growth Standards. WHO Child Growth Standards (2006)], available at: http://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/ru/
    6. WHO standards for child growth based on body length / height, weight and age. Acta Paediatrica, 2006, suppl 450, pp. 76-85 (in Russ.).
    7. Demʹyanova T.G., Grigorʹyants L.Ya., Avdeeva T.G., Rumyantsev A.G. Nablyudenie za gluboko nedonoshennymi detʹmi na pervom godu zhizni [Supervision over deeply premature babies in the first year of life]. Moscow: Medpraktika-M, 2006. 148 p.
    8. Bracewell M., Marlow N. Patterns of motor disability in very preterm children. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev., 2002, vol. 8(4), pp. 241-248.
    9. Postnatalʹnye standarty rosta dlya nedonoshennykh detey INTERGROWTH-21st [Postnatal Growth Standards for Premature Babies INTERGROWTH-21st], available at: https://intergrowth21.tghn.org/
    10. The likeness of fetal growth and newborn size across non-isolated populations in the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study and Newborn Cross-Sectional Study. The Lancet £ Diabetes Endocrinology, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 781–792.
    11. WHO Anthro. Programmnoe sredstvo VOZ Anthro dlya personalʹnykh kompʹyuterov [WHO Anthro. WHO Anthro software for personal computers], available at: http://www.who.int/childgrowth/software/ru/

    Метки: 2018, assessment methods, Children, E.A. ERMOLINA, G.S. MASKОVA, N.L. CHERNAYA, physical development, Practical medicine part 16 №8 Pediatrics (2018), premature, V.M. GANUZIN

    ‹ Comparative analysis of elemental status of full-term newborns and their mothers in Kazan (1996 and 2012) ROHHAD syndrome (literature review and case report) ›
    • rus Версия на русском языке


      usa English version site


      Find loupe

      

    • PARTNERS

      пов  logonew
    «Для
    Practical medicine. Scientific and practical reviewed medical journal
    All rights reserved ©