pm mfvt1
    • Main page
      • About journal
      • Articles. Working with contents
      • Editor-in-chief
      • Editorial Council
      • Editorial Board


      • For authors
      • Standards for formatting information
      • Reviewing
      • Politics editorial board
      • Ethics of journal publications


      • For advertisers
      • Subscription
      • About the Publishing House
      • Contact us
  • Chorioamnionitis, controversial issues of terminology and diagnostics

    Редактор | 2022, Literature reviews, Practical medicine part 20 №3. 2022 | 29 июля, 2022

    M.A. KAGANOVA, N.V. SPIRIDONOVA

    Samara State Medical University of MOH, Samara

    Contact details:

    Kaganova M.A. — PhD (medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Address: 80 Polevaya St., Samara, Russian Federation, 443100, tel.: +7 (846) 207-19-68, e-mail: mkaganova@yandex.ru

     Chorioamnionitis is a common cause of preterm birth and can lead to poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, including severe fetal neurodevelopmental consequences. Chorioamnionitis is characterized by a combination of heterogeneous conditions associated with infection or inflammation, which has led to changes in the definition and basic concepts of this condition. The article provides an overview of current publications about chorioamnionitis and presents the concept of Triple I, which includes three concepts: isolated maternal fever, suspected infection / inflammation, confirmed infection and inflammation. Depending on this classification, a decision is made on the term of completion of pregnancy and further management of newborns. The article also highlights methods for diagnosing chorioamnionitis, including immunological and microbiological markers, with an assessment of their sensitivity and specificity.

    Key words: chorioamnionitis, intraamniotic inflammation, amniocentesis, IL-6, MMP-8, funizitis, funiculitis, Triple I.

    REFERENCES

    1. Maki Y., Furukawa S., Nakayama T. et al. Clinical chorioamnionitis criteria are not sufficient for predicting intra-amniotic infection. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal Med, 2022, Jan., vol. 35 (1), pp. 52–57. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1711725
    2. Chaemsaithong P., Romero R., Korzeniewski S.J. et al. A rapid interleukin-6 bedside test for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm labor with intact membranes. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal Med, 2016, vol. 29 (3), pp. 349–359.
    3. Peng C.C., Chang J.H., Lin H.Y. et al. Intrauterine inflammation, infection, or both (Triple I): A new concept for chorioamnionitis. Pediatr. Neonatol, 2018, vol. 59 (3), pp. 231–237. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2017.09.001
    4. Maki Y., Furukawa S., Kodama Y. et al. Amniocentesis for threatened preterm labor with intact membranes and the impact on adverse outcome in infants born at 22 to 28 weeks of gestation. Early Hum Dev, 2015, vol. 91 (5), pp. 333–337.
    5. Minakami H., Maeda T., Fujii T. et al. Guidelines for obstetrical practice in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (JAOG) 2014 edition. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res, 2014, vol. 40 (6), pp. 1469–1499.
    6. Romero R., Miranda J., Chaiworapongsa T. et al. A novel molecular microbiologic technique for the rapid diagnosis of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intra-amniotic infection in preterm labor with intact membranes. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol, 2014, vol. 71 (4), pp. 330–358.
    7. Di Giulio D.B. Diversity of microbes in amniotic fluid. Semin Fetal. Neonat. Med, 2012, vol. 17 (1), pp. 2–11.
    8. Romero R., Chaemsaithong P., Docheva N. et al. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term VI: Acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis according to the presence or absence of microorganisms and inflammation in the amniotic cavity. J. Perinat. Med, 2016, vol. 44, pp. 33–51.
    9. Romero R., Miranda J., Chaiworapongsa T. et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of sterile intra–amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol, 2014, vol. 72, pp. 458–474.
    10. Romero R., Gomez-Lopez N., Kusanovic J.P. et al. Clinical Chorioamnionitis at Term: New Insights into the Etiology, Microbiology, and the Fetal, Maternal and Amniotic Cavity Inflammatory Responses. Nogyogyaszati Szuleszeti Tovabbkepzo Szemle, 2018, vol. 20 (3), pp. 103–112.
    11. Maul H., Kunze M., Berger R. Aktuelles Vorgehen bei frühem vorzeitigem Blasensprung: neue Definitionen? Ist die CRP-Bestimmungsinnvoll? Sind Alternativen in Sicht? [Current approach in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: new definitions? Is CRP determination useful? Are alternatives in sight?]. Gynakologe, 2021, vol. 54 (3), pp. 186–194. German. DOI: 10.1007/s00129-021-04750-3
    12. Gibbs R.S., Blanco J.D., St. Clair P.J. et al. Quantitative bacteriology of amniotic fluid from women with clinical intraamniotic infection at term. J. Infect. Dis, 1982, vol. 145 (1), pp. 1–8.
    13. Prezhdevremennye rody: klinicheskie rekomendatsii / razrabotchik klin. rekomendatsiy Rossiyskoe obshchestvo akusherov-ginekologov. Utverzhdeny 2020 g. [Premature birth: clinical guidelines / developer wedge. recommendations of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Approved 2020], avaialble at: https://roag-portal.ru/projects_obstetrics (accessed on: 23.03.2022).
    14. Tita A.T.N., Andrews W.W. Diagnosis and management of clinical chorioamnionitis. Clin. Perinatol, 2010, vol. 37 (2), pp. 339–354.
    15. Lencki S.G., Maciulla M.B., Eglinton G.S. Maternal and umbilical cord serum interleukin levels in preterm labor with clinical chorioamnionitis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 1994, vol. 170 (5), pp. 1345–1351.
    16. Infektsii amnioticheskoy polosti i plodnykh obolochek (khorioamnionit): klinicheskie rekomendatsii / razrabotchik klin. rekomendatsiy Rossiyskoe obshchestvo akusherov–ginekologov. Utverzhdeny 2021 g. [Infections of the amniotic cavity and fetal membranes (chorioamnionitis): clinical guidelines / developer clinic. recommendations of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Approved 2021], available at: https://roag-portal.ru/projects_obstetrics (accessed on: 23.03.2022)
    17. Coleman C., Carola D.L., Sloane A.J. et al. A comparison of Triple I classification with neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator recommendations in neonates born to mothers with clinical chorioamnionitis. Journal of Perinatology, 2020, vol. 40 (9), pp. 1308–1314. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-020-0727-9
    18. Higgins R.D., Saade G., Polin R.A. et al. Evaluation and management of women and newborns with a maternal diagnosis of chorioamnionitis: summary of a workshop. Obstet. Gynecol, 2016, vol. 127 (3), pp. 426–436.
    19. Bezhenar V.F., Shapkayts V.A., Dobrovol’skaya I.A. et al. Clinical features and criteria for the diagnosis of chorioamnionitis at the present stage. Reproduktivnoe zdorov’e. Vostochnaya Evropa, 2018, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 804–811 (in Russ.).
    20. Puopolo K.M., Benitz W.E., Zaoutis T.E. Committee on fetus and newborn and committee on infectious diseases Management of neonates born at >/=35 0/7 weeks’ gestation with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics, 2018, vol. 142 (6). e20182894. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-2894
    21. Ayrapetyan M., Carola D., Lakshminrusimha S. et al. Infants born to mothers with clinical chorioamnionitis: a cross-sectional survey on the use of early-onset sepsis risk calculator and prolonged use of antibiotics. Am. J. Perinatol, 2019, vol. 36, pp. 428–433.
    22. Pettinger K.J., Mayers K., McKechnie L. et al. Sensitivity of the Kaiser Permanente early-onset sepsis calculator: A systematic review and meta-analysis. E Clinical Medicine, 2019, vol. 19, p. 100227. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.11.020
    23. Edwards M.S. Postnatal bacterial infections. In: Martin R.J., Fanaroff A.A., Walsh M.C. eds. Fanaroff and Martin’s neonatal perinatal medicine disease of the fetus and ınfant. 8th ed. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier, 2006. Pp. 791–804.
    24. Smulian J.C., Shen-Schwarz S., Vintzileos A.M. et al. Clinical chorioamnionitis and histologic placental inflammation. Obstet. Gynecol, 1999, vol. (6), pp. 1000–1005. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00416-0
    25. Steel J.H., O’donoghue K., Kennea N.L. et al. Maternal origin of inflammatory leukocytes in preterm fetal membranes, shown by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Placenta, 2005, vol. 26 (8–9), pp. 672–677. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2004.10.003
    26. Ha X., Du H., Cao Y. et al. Association of histological and clinical chorioamnionitis with perinatal and neonatal outcome. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal Med, 2019, vol. 31, pp. 1–9.
    27. Aguin E., Aguin T., Cordoba M. et al. Amniotic fluid inflammation with negative culture and outcome after cervical cerclage. J. Matern. Fetal. Med, 2012, vol. 25 (10), pp. 1990–1994.
    28. Thomson A.J.; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Care of Women Presenting with Suspected Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes from 24+0 Weeks of Gestation: Green-top Guideline No. 73. BJOG, 2019, vol. 126 (9), p. e152–e166. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15803
    29. van de Laar R., van der Ham D.P., Oei S.G. et al. Accuracy of C-reactive protein determination in predicting chorioamnionitis and neonatal infection in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes: a systematic review. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2009, vol. 147 (2), pp. 124–129.
    30. Trochez-Martinez R.D., Smith P., Lamont R.F. Use of C-reactive protein as a predictor of chorioamnionitis in pretermprelabour rupture of membranes: asystematic review. BJOG, 2007, vol. 114 (7), pp. 796–801.
    31. Musilova I., Kacerovsky M., Stepan M. et al. Maternal serum C-reactive protein concentration and intra-amniotic inflammation in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. PLoS One, 2017, vol. 12 (8), pp. e0182731. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182731
    32. Romero R., Sepulveda W., Kenney J.S. et al. Interleukin 6 determination in the detection of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Ciba Found Symp, 1992, vol. 167, pp. 205–220. DOI: 10.1002/9780470514269.ch13
    33. Chaiyasit N., Romero R., Chaemsaithong P. et al. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term VIII: a rapid MMP-8 test for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation. J. Perinat. Med, 2017, vol. 45 (5), pp. 539–550. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0344
    34. Combs C.A., Gravett M., Garite T.J. et al. Amniotic fluid infection, inflammation, and colonization in preterm labor with intact membranes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 2014, vol. 210 (2), pp. 125e1–125e15.
    35. Romero R., Yoon B.H., Mazor M. et al. The diagnostic and prognostic value of amniotic fluid white blood cell count, glucose, interleukin-6, and gram stain in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 1993, vol. 169 (4), pp. 805–816.
    36. Leaños-Miranda A., Nolasco-Leaños A.G., Carrillo-Juárez R.I. et al. Interleukin-6 in Amniotic Fluid: A Reliable Marker for Adverse Outcomes in Women in Preterm Labor and Intact Membranes. Fetal. Diagn. Ther, 2021, vol. 48 (4), pp. 313–320. DOI: 10.1159/000514898
    37. Kaganova M.A., Spiridonova N.V., Medvedchikova-Ardiya L.K. et al. Microbiological and biochemical characteristics of amniotic fluid during full-term pregnancy, complicated by premature rupture of amniotic fluid. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii, 2021, no. 20 (6), pp. 56–64 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.20953/1726-1678-2021-6-56-64
    38. Combs C.A., Garite T.J., Lapidus J.A. et al. Detection of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity by analysis of cervicovaginal proteins in women with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 2015, vol. 212 (4), pp. 482.e1–482.e12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.007
    39. Sharp G.C., Stock S.J., Norman J.E. Fetal assessment methods for improving neonatal and maternal outcomes in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev, 2014, vol. 10, CD010209.
    40. Lisonkova S., Sabr Y., Joseph K.S. Diagnosis of subclinical amniotic fluid infection prior to rescue cerclage using gram stain and glucose tests: an individual patient meta-analysis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can, 2014, vol. 36 (2), pp. 116–122. DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30656-3
    41. Istimiko-tservikal’naya nedostatochnost’ klinicheskie rekomendatsii / razrabotchik klin. rekomendatsiy Rossiyskoe obshchestvo akusherov-ginekologov. Utverzhdeny 2021 g. [Istimiko-cervical insufficiency clinical guidelines / developer wedge. recommendations of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Approved 2021], available at: https://roag-portal.ru/projects_obstetrics (accessed on: 23.03.2022)
    42. Balciuniene G., Gulbiniene V., Dumalakiene I. et al. Prognostic Markers for Chorioamnionitis: IL-6, TNF-α, and MMP-8 in Vaginally Obtained Amniotic Fluid. J. Clin. Med, 2021, vol. 10 (5), 1136. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10051136
    43. Kacerovsky M., Musilova I., Bestvina T. et al. Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes between 34 and 37 Weeks: A Point-of-Care Test of Vaginal Fluid Interleukin-6 Concentrations for a Noninvasive Detection of Intra-Amniotic Inflammation. Fetal Diagn. Ther, 2018, vol. 43 (3), pp. 175–183. DOI: 10.1159/000477617
    44. Chaemsaithong P., Romero R., Docheva N. et al. Comparison of rapid MMP-8 and interleukin-6 point-of-care tests to identify intra-amniotic inflammation/infection and impending preterm delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal Med, 2018, vol. 31 (2), pp. 228–244. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1281904
    45. Chaemsaithong P., Romero R., Korzeniewski S.J. et al. A rapid interleukin-6 bedside test for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm labor with intact membranes. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal Med., 2016, vol. 29 (3), pp. 349–359. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1006620
    46. Pugni L., Pietrasanta C., Acaia B. et al. Chorioamnionitis and neonatal outcome in preterm infants: A clinical overview. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal Med, 2016, vol. 29, pp. 1525–1529.
    47. Artemenko V.V. Diagnostic value of clinical and laboratory examination of amniotic fluid in the physiological and pathological course of pregnancy. Zdorov’e zhenshchiny, 2013, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 87–97 (in Russ.).
    48. Kuz’min V.N., Kharchenko E.I. Differentiated approach to antibiotic therapy for premature rupture of the amniotic membranes. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii, 2017, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 78–81 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.20953/1726-1678-2017-5-78-81
    49. Ocheke N., Ocheke I.E., Agaba P.A. et al. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Histological Chorioamnionitis. J. West. Afr. Coll Surg, 2016, vol. 6, pp. 1–14.
    50. Yoon B.H., Romero R., Park J.Y., et al. Antibiotic administration can eradicate intra-amniotic infection or intraamniotic inflammation in a subset of patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 2019, vol. 221 (2), pp. 142.e1–142.e22.
    51. Holmström E., Myntti T., Sorsa, E. et al. Cervical and Amniotic Fluid Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 and Interleukin-6 Concentrations in Preterm Pregnancies with or without Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. Fetal Diagn. Ther, 2019, vol. 46, pp. 103–110.

    Метки: 2022, amniocentesis, chorioamnionitis, funiculitis, funizitis, IL-6, intraamniotic inflammation, M.A. KAGANOVA, MMP-8, N.V. Spiridonova, Practical medicine part 20 №3. 2022, Triple I

    ‹  Modern concepts of immune protection mechanisms under the new coronavirus infection  Dextrocardia as a cardial development abnormality ›
    • rus Версия на русском языке


      usa English version site


      Find loupe

      

    • PARTNERS

      пов  logonew
    «Для
    Practical medicine. Scientific and practical reviewed medical journal
    All rights reserved ©