pm mfvt1
    • Main page
      • About journal
      • Articles. Working with contents
      • Editor-in-chief
      • Editorial Council
      • Editorial Board


      • For authors
      • Standards for formatting information
      • Reviewing
      • Politics editorial board
      • Ethics of journal publications


      • For advertisers
      • Subscription
      • About the Publishing House
      • Contact us
  •  Bullying, cyberbullying, and anti-bullying school programs

    Редактор | 2025, Literature reviews, Practical medicine part 23 №4. 2025 | 31 июля, 2025

    V.M. GANUZIN

     Yaroslavl State Medical University, Yaroslavl

    Contact details:

    Ganuzin V.M. — PhD (Medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Postgraduate Education

    Address: 5 Revolyutsionnaya St., 150000 Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, tel.: +7 (4852) 30-56-41, e-mail: vganuzin@rambler.ru

    The influence of psychotraumatic factors in childhood and adolescence is a relevant problem for many schools in various countries. The article offers an analysis of the most well-known and broadly used anti-bullying school programs in the USA and Europe. The author shows the influence of psychotraumatic factors in the educational environment on the emergence of bullying and victimization in children and adolescents. The review is based on RSCI, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases.

    Key words: review, bullying, cyberbullying, victimization, anti-bullying school programs, children and adolescents.

    REFERENCES

    1. Olweus D. Bullying in school: basic facts and implications of a school-based intervention program. Child Psychol. Psych, 1994a, vol. 35, pp. 1171–1190.
    2. Ganuzin V.M. The influence of psychotraumatic factors in childhood and adolescence on their life paradigm (review). Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2021, vol. 19 (6), pp. 26–31 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32000/2072-1757-2021-6-26-31
    3. Ganuzin V.M., Borokhov B.D. Psychotraumatic factors in school age and their impact on health: post-didactic stress disorder (review). Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii: setevoy nauch. zhurn, 2022, vol. 14, no. 1 (in Russ.), available at: http://mprj.ru (accessed on: 17.04.2025).
    4. Gaffney H., Ttofi M.M., Farrington D.P. Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Syst. Rev, 202; 17(2): e1143. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1143.
    5. Ganuzin V.M. Pedagogical violence syndrome as a form of didactogeny. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii, 2013, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 15 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2219-8245-2013-15150
    6. Ganuzin V.M., Fattakhova A.S. nalysis of modern scientific literature on victimization of children and adolescents in the educational environment. Voprosy psikhicheskogo zdorov’ya detey i podrostkov, 2024, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 96–110 (in Russ.).
    7. Ryabinina M.V. The influence of school post-didactic stress on the success of higher education. Obzor pedagogicheskikh issledovaniy, 2023, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 18–23 (in Russ.).
    8. Ganuzin V.M. Pedagogical violence syndrome, dadactogenia, bullying, victimization, post-didactic stress disorder: children, school and negative consequences of the educational environment (review). Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii, 2024, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 59–69 (in Russ.), available at: https://mprj.elpub.ru/jour (accessed on: 19.04.2025).
    9. Milushkina O.Yu., Dubrovina E.A., Grigor’eva Z.A., Kozyreva F.U., Pivovarov Yu.P. The influence of the modern educational environment on the neuropsychic health of school-age children. Rossiyskiy vestnik gigieny, 2023, no. 4, pp. 47–56 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24075/rbh.2023.085 25
    10. Khokhlov L.K., Khokhlov A.L., Shipov A.A. School didactic neuroses and other mental reactions. Pedagogicheskiy vestnik, 1998, no. 2 (in Russ.), available at: http://www.yspu.yar.ru/vestnik/uchenue_praktikam/6_2 (accessed on: 07.04.2025).
    11. Romanovskaya M.V., Fesenko Yu.A. Prevention of suicidal behavior in children and adolescents. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii, 2024, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 32–44 (in Russ.), available at: https://mprj.elpub.ru/jour (accessed on: 19.04.2025).
    12. Bochaver A.A. Bullying as destructive joint coping of the school community: a new conceptualization. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2024, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 569–586 (in Russ.).
    13. Olweus D. Bully/victim problems among school children: Long‐term consequences and an effective intervention program. In Hodgins S. (Ed.), Mental disorder and crime. 1993, rr. 317–349.
    14. 32 Shocking Bullying Statistics That Will Capture Public Attention in 2023, available at: https://whattobecome.com/blog/bullying-statistics/
    15. Hinduja S., Patchin J.W. Connecting Adolescent Suicide to the Severity of Bullying and Cyberbullying. School Violence, 2018, vol. 18 (3), pp. 333–346. DOI: 10.1080/15388220.2018.1492417
    16. Ganuzin V.M. Review of modern research on the use of weapons by adolescents in the educational environment. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii: setevoy nauch. zhurn, 2023, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 6 (in Russ.), available at: http://mprj.ru (accessed on: 17.04.2025).
    17. Kapirenkova, O.N., Piskazheva M.I. Bullying in the modern educational environment. Psikhologiya kognitivnykh protsessov, 2020, no. 9, pp. 177–184 (in Russ.).
    18. Baldry A.C., Farrington D.P., Sorrentino A. School bullying and cyberbullying among boys and girls: roles and overlap. Aggression, Maltreatment Trauma, 2017, vol. 26 (9), pp. 937–951. DOI: 10.1080/10926771.2017.1330793
    19. Ganuzin V.M., Maskova G.S., Mozzhukhina L.I., Shubina E.V. Cyberbullying among adolescents. Rossiyskiy pediatricheskiy zhurnal, 2025, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 79–84 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.46563/1560-9561-2025-28-1-79-84
    20. Madsen C.R., Damsgaard M.T., Petersen K., Qualter P., Holstein B.E. School bullying, cyberbullying, and loneliness: a nationally representative study of adolescents in Denmark. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2024, vol. 21 (4), p. 414. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21040414
    21. Barak A., Hen L., Boniel-Nissim M., Shapira N. A comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions. Technol. Hum. Serv, 2008, vol. 26 (2-4), pp. 109–60. DOI: 10.1080/15228830802094429
    22. Bonsaksen T., Kleppang A.L., Steigen A.M. Cyberbullying among adolescents in Norway: changes over time and factors associated with delinquency and victimization. Sci. (Basel), 2024, vol. 14 (11), p. 1043. DOI: 10.3390/bs14111043
    23. Semenova N.B. Bullying and cyberbullying among adolescents: prevalence, methods of intimidation, role behavior of participants. Zdravookhranenie Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2023, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 313–319 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.47470/0044-197X-2023-67-4-313-319
    24. Sheynov V.P. Kiberbulling: predposylki i posledstviya. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya, 2021 [Cyberbullying: prerequisites and consequences. Psychological research, 2021], available at: https://cyberpsy.ru/articles/kiberbullingpredposylki-posledstviya/ (accessed on: 19.04.2025).
    25. Ortega R., Del Rey R., Mora-Merchán J.A. SAVE model: an anti-bullying intervention in Spain. In: Smith P.K., Pepler D., Rigby K., eds. Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be? Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. 167–186.
    26. Meraviglia M.G., Becker H., Rosenbluth B., Sanchez E., Robertson T. The Expectation of Respect Project: creating a positive elementary school climate. Interpersonal Violence, 2003, vol. 18 (11), pp. 1347–1360. DOI: 10.1177/0886260503257457
    27. Menesini E., Nocentini A., Palladino B.E. Empowering students against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of an Italian peer‐led model. J. Conflict Violence, 2012, vol. 6 (2), pp. 314–320.
    28. Zambuto V., Stefanelli F., Palladino B.E., Nocentini A., Menesini E. The effect of the NoTrap! Antibullying program on ethnic victimization: When the peer educators’ immigrant status matters. Developmental Psychol, 2022, vol. 58 (6), pp. 1176–1187. DOI: 10.1037/dev0001343
    29. O’Moore A.M., Minton S.J. Ireland: the Donegal Primary Schools’ anti-bullying project. In: Smith P.K., Pepler D., Rigby K., eds. Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be? Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. 275–288.
    30. Cross D., Monks H., Hall M., Shaw T., Pintabona Y., Erceg E. et al. Three‐year results of the Friendly School whole‐of‐school intervention on children’s bullying behavior. British Educational Res. J, 2011, vol. 37 (1), pp. 105–129. DOI: 10.1080/01411920903420024
    31. Salmivalli C., Kärnä A., Poskiparta E. Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. J. Behav. Develop, 2011, vol. 35 (5), pp. 405–411. DOI: 10.1177/0165025411407457
    32. Kärnä A., Voeten M., Little T.D., Alanen E., Poskiparta E., Salmivalli C. Effectiveness of the KiVa Antibullying Program: Grades 1–3 and 7–9. Educational Psychol, 2013, vol. 105 (2), pp. 535–551. DOI: 10.1037/a0030417
    33. Olweus D., Limber S.P. Some problems with cyberbullying research. Opin. Psychol, 2017, vol. 19, pp. 139–143.
    34. Olweus D. Bully/victim problems among school children: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. In Pepler D.J., Rubin K.H. (Eds.). The development and treatment of childhood aggression, 1991, pp. 411–448.
    35. Brown E.C., Low S., Smith B.H., Haggerty K.P. Outcomes from a school‐randomized controlled trial of Steps to Respect: A bullying prevention program. School Psychol. Rev, 2011, vol. 40 (3), pp. 423–443. DOI: 10.1037/e734362011-045
    36. Lewis K.M., DuBois D.L., Bavarian N., Acock A., Silverthorn N., Day J. et al. Effects of Positive Action on the emotional health of urban youth: a cluster-randomized trial. Adolesc. Health, 2013, vol. 53 (6), pp. 706–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.06.012
    37. Ganuzin V.M., Romanycheva E.N., Kurchina E.G. Department of medical and social assistance in polyclinics for individual children and adolescents from families in a working life situation. Voprosy shkol’noy i universitetskoy meditsiny i zdorov’ya, 2016, no. 2, pp. 36–38 (in Russ.).
    38. Ganuzin V.M., Golubyatnikova E.V. Childhood disability, prevention, rehabilitation and habilitation of children with disabilities. Voprosy psikhicheskogo zdorov’ya detey i podrostkov, 2017, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 55–56 (in Russ.).

    Метки: 2025, anti-bullying school programs, bullying, children and adolescents, cyberbullying, Practical medicine part 23 №4. 2025, review, V.M. GANUZIN, victimization

    ‹  Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: heterogeneity of the pathology  Factors influencing type 1 myocardial infarction death in working-age men ›
    • rus Версия на русском языке


      usa English version site


      Find loupe

      

    • PARTNERS

      пов  logonew
    «Для
    Practical medicine. Scientific and practical reviewed medical journal
    All rights reserved ©