pm mfvt1
    • Main page
      • About journal
      • Articles. Working with contents
      • Editor-in-chief
      • Editorial Council
      • Editorial Board


      • For authors
      • Standards for formatting information
      • Reviewing
      • Politics editorial board
      • Ethics of journal publications


      • For advertisers
      • Subscription
      • About the Publishing House
      • Contact us
  • Assessment of the opinion of medical personnel about vaccination

    Редактор | 2020, Practical medicine part 18 №6. 2020 | 30 ноября, 2020

    D.R. AGLIULLIN1, ZH.G. EREMEEVA1, 2, S.T. AGLIULLINA1, A.R. GAYNETDINOVA1, T.N. KOROLEVA1, K.G. GUSEVA1

     1Kazan State Medical University, Kazan

    2Republican Clinical Dermatovenerologic Dispensary, Kazan

      Contact details:

    Eremeeva Zh.G. — epidemiologist, Assistant Lecturer of the Department of Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine

    Address: 49 Butlerov St., Russian Federation, Kazan, 420012, tel.: +7 (843) 236-68-92, e-mail: Z.Eremeeva@tatar.ru

     The purpose — is to assess the opinion of medical personnel about vaccination.

    Material and methods. Microsoft Excel 2010 and Openapi online calculator were used to analyze the results of questioning medical personnel about the role and necessity of immunoprophylaxis of infectious diseases.

    Results. A positive attitude to vaccination was recorded in 80% (95% CI 66,7–93,3%) of respondents. The majority of medical personnel — 87% (95% CI 81,3–92,7%) heard negative feedback about vaccinations from the population. Medical personnel are more likely to choose free of charge vaccinations — 82% (95% CI 75,5–88,5%), based on their availability, reliability and a high level of control. The majority of respondents — 96% (95% CI 92,7–99,3%) noted a high level of education on immunization issues. However, doctors are statistically significantly more likely to consider vaccination a necessary preventive measure than nursing staff (criterion χ2 = 19,35; df = 1; p = 0,00001090). Regarding the vaccine against the new coronavirus infection COVID-19, the majority — 60 people (43,5%) (95% CI 35,2–51,8%) of medical professionals have not yet decided whether they will be vaccinated or not.

    Conclusion. The study results demonstrated the proper level of immunization of medical personnel and their positive attitude to vaccination in general. However, frequent negative reviews of the population indicate the need for information work among the population about the purpose and importance of vaccination in the society.

    Key words: questionnaire, vaccination, infections, medical personnel.

    REFERENCES

    1. Lopushov D.V., Fazulzyanova I.M., Trifonov V.A. Organization and results of monitoring of undesirable post-vaccination events in the Republic of Tatarstan. Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika, 2017, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 98–103 (in Russ.).
    2. Patyashina M.A., Trofimova M.V., Avdonina L.G., Zamalieva M.A., Balabanova L.A. New approaches to preventive campaigns in modern conditions on the example of Tatarstan. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya, 2017, vol. 291, no. 6, pp. 10–12 (in Russ.).
    3. O sostoyanii sanitarno-epidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Respublike Tatarstan v 2018 godu: Gosudarstvennyy doklad [On the state of sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population in the Republic of Tatarstan in 2018: State report]. Kazan: Federal’naya sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere zashchity prav potrebiteley i blagopoluchiya cheloveka, 2019. 361 p.
    4. Yakupova F.M., Fazylov V.Kh. Immunoprophylaxis of perinatal hepatitis virus infection in family foci. Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2014, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 140–144 (in Russ.).
    5. Ob utverzhdenii natsional’nogo kalendarya profilakticheskikh privivok i kalendarya profilakticheskikh privivok po epidemicheskim pokazaniyam (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami ot 24 aprelya 2019 goda): Prikaz Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya RF ot 21.03.2014 no. 125n. Prilozhenie no. 1 [On the approval of the national calendar of preventive vaccinations and the calendar of preventive vaccinations for epidemic indications (with amendments and additions dated April 24, 2019): Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated March 21, 2014 No. 125n. Appendix No. 1].
    6. Buchkova T.N., Zryachkin N.I., Polyakov K.A., Chebotareva G.I. Reasons for untimely vaccination against hepatitis B. Detskie infektsii, 2012, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 36–38 (in Russ.).
    7. Platonova T.A., Golubkova A.A., Koltunova E.S., Smirnova S.S., Abdulvalieva V.V., Kuznetsova O.A. National calendar of preventive vaccinations: quality of performance and determining factors. Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika, 2019, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 97-103 (in Russ.).
    8. Davletshina L.R., Chirkova T.A., Tolmachev D.A. The attitude of parents to the vaccination of high school children for the prevention of influenza. Colloquium-journal, 2019, vol. 9, no. 33, pp. 53–55 (in Russ.).
    9. Ivardava M.I. Vaccine prophylaxis: recommendations for doctors and parents. Pediatricheskaya farmokologiya, 2011, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 127–131 (in Russ.).
    10. Chervatyuk M.I., Mishchenko A.N., Efremova O.A. Clinical efficacy of influenza vaccination in patients with obstructive pulmonary disease. Evraziyskiy soyuz uchenykh, 2019, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 54–56 (in Russ.).
    11. Platonova T.A., Golubkova A.A., Koltunova E.S et al. National calendar of preventive vaccinations: performance quality and determining factors. Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika, 2019, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 97–103 (in Russ.).

    Метки: 2020, A.R. GAYNETDINOVA, D.R. AGLIULLIN, infections, K.G. GUSEVA, medical personnel, Practical medicine part 18 №6. 2020, questionnaire, S.T. AGLIULLINA, T.N. KOROLEVA, vaccination, Zh.G. EREMEEVA

    ‹ Monitoring of accidents with exposure to blood among medical workers of the Republic of Tatarstan Alport syndrome and the polypharmacy problem in the practice of ENT specialists ›
    • rus Версия на русском языке


      usa English version site


      Find loupe

      

    • PARTNERS

      пов  logonew
    «Для
    Practical medicine. Scientific and practical reviewed medical journal
    All rights reserved ©