F.F. MINNULLINA^1, 2, L.R. AKHMETSHINA², L.M. MUKHAMETZYANOVA^1, 2

 ¹Republic Clinical Hospital, Kazan

²Kazan (Volga) Federal University, Kazan

 Contact details:

Minnullina F.F. — PhD (medicine), Associate Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases, Leading Researcher, Head of the Gynecology Department

Address: Orenburgskiy trakt 138, Kazan, Russian Federation, 420064, tel.: +7-987-233-04-78, e-mail: minnullina_f@mail.ru

The purpose — to share the experience of pregnancy management with the placenta presentation and incretion into the scar at a gestation period of over 12 weeks.

Main provisions: the growth of operative delivery is associated with an increase in the number of women of reproductive age planning a second and subsequent pregnancy with a scar on the uterus. We describe a rare example of the management of a patient with the placenta presentation and incretion into the scar after conservative and surgical therapy.

Key words: uterine scar, placenta incretion and presentation, conservative treatment, multi-speciality treatment.

REFERENCES

1. Elson C.J., Salim R., Potdar N., Chetty M., Ross J.A., Kirk E.J. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. BJOG, 2016. Green-top Guideline No. 21 RCOG/AEPU Joint Guideline / November 2016, pp. 1–41.
2. Zakut H., Achiron R., Schejter E. Ectopic pregnancy management by a noninvasive protocol. Clin Exp. Obstet. Gynecol, 1985, vol. 12 (1–2), pp. 3–8.
3. Shchukina N.A., Blagina E.I., Barinova I.V. Reasons for the formation of an inconsistent scar on the uterus after caesarean section. Al’manakh klinicheskoy meditsiny, 2015, no. 37, pp. 85–92 (in Russ.).
4. Polikarpov A.V., Aleksandrova G.A., Golubev N.A., Tyurina E.M. et al. Osnovnye pokazateli zdorov’ya materi i rebenka, deyatel’nost’ sluzhby okhrany detstva i rodovspomozheniya v RF. MZ RF. Departament monitoringa, analiza i strategicheskogo razvitiya zdravookhraneniya. FGBU «Tsentral’nyy nauchno-issledovatel’skiy institut organizatsii i informatizatsii zdravookhraneniya» MZ RF [Main indicators of maternal and child health, the activities of the service of child protection and obstetrics in the Russian Federation. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Department of monitoring, analysis and strategic development of healthcare. Federal State Budgetary Institution «Central Research Institute for Organization and Informatization of Health Care» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation], 2018.
5. Vuchenovich Yu.D., Olenev A.S., Novikova V.A., Radzinskiy V.E. Cesarean section: the boundaries of risk and safety. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie, 2019, vol. 7, no. 3 (in Russ.).
6. Barinova I.V., Kondrikov N.I., Voloshchuk I.N., Chechneva M.A., Shchukina N.A., Petrukhin V.A. Features of the pathogenesis of placental ingrowth into the scar after cesarean section. Arkhiv patologii, 2018, no. 80 (2), pp. 18–23 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/patol201880218-23
7. Parra-Herran C., Djordjevic B. Histopathology of placenta creta: chorionic villi intrusion into myometrial vascular spaces and extravillous trophoblast proliferation are frequent and specific findings with implications for diagnosis and pathogenesis. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 2016, vol. 35 (6), pp. 497–508. DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000250
8. Popek E.J. Placenta accreta. In: Heerema-McKenney A., Popek E.J., De Paepe M.E. eds. Diagnostic pathology: placenta, 2015, vol. 3 (6), pp. 2–7.
9. Mooney E.E., Doyle E.M. Non-neoplastic maternal gestational diseases. In: Mutter G.L., Prat J., eds. Pathology of the female reproductive tract. 3-rd ed. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2014. Pp. 775–776.
10. Komissarova L.M., Vasil’chenko O.N. Organ-saving tactics of delivery with true placenta accreta. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa, 2009, no. 9 (6), pp. 25-28 (in Russ.).
11. Kurtser M.A., Breslav I.Yu., Lukashina M.V., Shtabnitskiy A.M., Alekseeva T.V., Platitsyn I.V., Zemlyanskaya E.A. True placenta ingrowth (placenta accreta). Konservativnaya terapiya. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya, 2011, no. 4, pp. 118–122 (in Russ.).
12. Kurtser M.A., Kutakova Yu.Yu., Breslav I.Yu., Songolova E.N. Placenta accreta: saving the uterus. Status Praesens. Ginekologiya, akusherstvo, besplodnyy brak, 2013, no. 14 (3), pp. 14–19 (in Russ.).
13. Voytyuk E.G., Altynnik N.A., Medvedev M.V. Clinical observation of true placenta accreta during ultrasound diagnostics. Saratovskiy nauchno-meditsinskiy zhurnal, 2015, no. 11 (2), pp. 156–159 (in Russ.).
14. Tskhay V.B., Yametov P.K., Brezhneva N.V., Levanova E.A. The effectiveness of methods of X-ray endovascular occlusion of arterial vessels in reducing intraoperative blood loss in pregnant women with placenta previa. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya, 2015, no. 10, pp. 5–10 (in Russ.).
15. Maymon R., Svirsky R., Smorgick N., Mendlovic S., Halperin R., Gilad K., Tovbin J. Fertility performance and obstetric outcomes among women with previous cesarean scar pregnancy. J. Ultrasound Med, 2011, vol. 30 (9), pp. 1179–1184.
16. Seow K.M., Huang L.W., Lin Y.H., Lin M., Tsai Y.L., Hwang J.L. et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, vol. 23, pp. 247–253.
17. Ko J.K., Li R.H., Cheung V.Y. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a 10-year experience. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2015, vol. 55, pp. 64–69.
18. Riaz R.M., Williams T., Craig B., Myers D. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: imaging features, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes. Abdominal Imaging, 2015, vol. 40, pp. 2589–2599.
19. Rotas M.A., Haberman S., Levgur M. Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancies: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, vol. 107, pp. 1373–1381.
20. Einenkel J., Stumpp P., Kösling S., Horn L.-C., Höckel M. A misdiagnosed case of caesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2005, vol. 271, pp. 178–181.
21. Zhang Y., Gu Y., Wang J.M., Li Y. Analysis of cases with cesarean scar pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2013, vol. 39, pp. 195–202.