V.R. POLYAKOVA, B.G. DZHASHI, I.A. MELIKHOVA

The Volgograd Branch of the S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, 80 Zemlyachki Str., Volgograd, Russian Federation, 400138

 Polyakova V.R. ― ophthalmologist, tel. (8442) 58-15-59, e-mail: [email protected]

Dzhashi B.G. ― ophthalmologist, tel. (8442) 91-69-94, e-mail: [email protected]

Melikhova I.A. ― ophthalmologist, tel. (8442) 91-67-77, e-mail: [email protected]

 The study included 25 patients (25 eyes) with cataracts of varying degrees of density, the control group included 25 patients (25 eyes) with an optically transparent lens. The range of the lens acoustic density values by the respective Buratto values was as follows: degree 1 ― from 17.3 to 22.4 DB, degree 2 ― from 22.5 to 26.9 DB, degree 3 ― from 27 to 35 DB, degree 4 ― more than 35 DB. The ultrasound biomicroscopy of eye allows to determine the lens acoustic density. The lens density value exceeding 35 dB suggests potential difficulties associated with the fragmentation and removal of the lens during the operation.

Key words: ultrasound biomicroscopy eyes, lens acoustic density.

REFERENCES

1. Avetisov K.S. Research Methods lens. Vestnik oftal’mologii, 2010, no. 2, pp. 37-42 (in Russ.).
2. Aznabaev M.T., Kuvandykova D.G. Metod opredeleniya tverdosti yadra khrustalika [Method for determination of hardness of the lens nucleus]. V sb.: “Novye tekhnologii mikrokhirurgii glaza”. Orenburg, 2001. Pp. 226-228.
3. Buratto L. Khirurgiya katarakty. Per. s angl. [Cataract surgery. Transl. from English]. Milan, 1999. 540 p.
4. Krasnov M.M., Makarov I.A., Said Naim Yussef Densitometric analysis of lens nucleus in the choice of surgical treatment of cataract. Vestnik oftal’mologii, 2000, no. 4, pp. 6-8 (in Russ.).
5. Makarov I.A. Quantitative colorimetry lens imaging in the evaluation of the maturity of the cataract, and the density of the lens nucleus. Sovremennye tekhnologii khirurgii katarakty 2002: Sb. nauch. st. GU MNTK “Mikrokhirurgiya glaza”. Moscow, 2002. Pp. 209-212.
6. Rubtsova I.V. Rannyaya diagnostika i lechenie nachal’nykh narusheniy prozrachnosti khrustalika: avtoref. dis. … kand. med. nauk [Early diagnosis and treatment of primary disorders of lens transparency. Synopsis of dis. PhD med. sciences]. Saint Petersburg, 1995. 25 p.
7. Chuprov A.D., Kudryavtsev V.A., Kudryavtseva Yu.V. Opredelenie mekhanicheskoy tverdosti khrustalika ul’trazvukovym metodom [Determination of the mechanical hardness of the lens by ultrasonic method]. Novye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchn.-prakt. konf. Kazan, 2008. Pp. 223-226.
8. Fedorov S.N., Malyugin B.E., Shpak A.A., Zakharova N.K., Moiseenko G.L. Sposob opredeleniya pokazaniy k fakoemul’sifikatsii. Patent RF na izobretenie A61B8/10 no. 2173957 ot 27.09.2001 [The method for determining the indications for phacoemulsification. Patent for invention A61B8 / 10 no. 2173957 from 27.09.2001].
9. Shpak A.A., Malyugin B.E., Zakharova N.K. Otsenka plotnosti yadra khrustalika metodom ul’trazvukovogo V-skanirovaniya [Evaluation of the density of the lens by ultrasound B-scan engine]. Sovremennye tekhnologii khirurgii katarakty 2000: Sb. nauch. st. GU MNTK “Mikrokhirurgiya glaza”. Moscow, 2000. Pp. 193-196.
10. Buratto L. Phacoemulsification. SLACK inc., 1998. P. 544.
11. Sillivan P. et al. Risk factors for retinal detachment after cataract surgery. JCRS, 2006, vol. 113 (4), pp. 650-656.