R.F. GAYFULLIN¹, A.A. KHASANOV^1,2, I.V. KLYUCHAROV^1,2, N.R. AKRAMOV², R.N. FARKHUTDINOV^1,3

¹Republican Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Republic of Tatarstan, 138 Orenburgskiy Trakt, Kazan, Russian Federation 420064

²Kazan State Medical University, 49 Butlerov St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012

³Kazan State Medical Academy, 36 Butlerov St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012

Gayfullin R.F. — D. Med. Sc., Chief Doctor, tel. (843) 237-35-76, e-mail: [email protected]¹

Khasanov A.A. — D. Med. Sc., Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology № 1, tel. +7-917-239-15-00, e-mail: [email protected]^1,2

Klyucharov I.V. — Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, tel. +7-917-282-44-74, e-mail: [email protected]^1,2

Akramov N.R. — D. Med. Sc., Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Professional Development, tel. +7-917-253-77-20, e-mail: [email protected]²

Fakhrutdinov R.N. — Cand. Med. Sc., Head of Surgical Unit, Associate Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, tel. +7-905-376-05-21, e-mail: [email protected]^1,3

The fast penetration of minimally invasive surgery into gynecology and other branches causes the change in concepts and principles of training and improving the gynecologist — endoscopic surgeon. The classical model of education does not meet the needs for practical skills that require multiple repetitions to achieve psychomotor competence. Moreover, given the growing attention to patient safety, the new educational paradigm should help resolve the conflict between the right of a physician for training and the patient’s right for high-quality surgery.

Key words: endoscopic laparoscopy, surgery, gynecology, training.

 

 

REFERENCES

1. Fedorov A.V., Olovyannyy V.E. Laparoscopic surgery in the regions of Russia: problems and ways of development. Khirurgiya, 2011, no. 6, pp. 4-10 (in Russ.).

2. Fedorov A.V., Gorshkov M.D. The results of two years of experience using virtual simulators in training simulators Endoscopic Surgeons. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya, 2009, no. 5, pp. 48-50 (in Russ.).

3. Simulyatsionnoe obuchenie v meditsine, pod red prof. A.A. Svistunova [Simulation training in medicine. Edited by prof. A.A. Svistunova]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Pervogo MGMU im. I.M. Sechenova, 2013. Pp. 200-217.

4. http:/www.igz.nl/actueel/nieuwsberichten/min

5. Campo R., Reising C., Belle Y.V. et al. A valid model for testing and training laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Gynecol Surg., 2010, vol. 7, pp. 133-141.

6. Fedorov I.V. Instrumenty i oborudovanie dlya endoskopicheskoy khirurgii [Tools and equipment for endoscopic surgery]. Kazan: Papirus, 2011. 144 p.

7. Molinas C.R., De Win G., Ritter O. et al. Feasibility and construct validity of a novel laparoscopic skills testing and training model. Gynecol Surg., 2008, vol. 5, pp. 281-290.

8. Molinas C.R., Campo R. Defining a structured training program for acquiring basic and advanced laparoscopic psychomotor skills on simulator. Gynecol Surg., 2010, vol. 7, pp. 427-435.

9. Marrero M.A., Korfman R.S. Laparoscopic use of sutures. Clin Obstet Gynecol., 1991, vol. 34 (2), pp. 387-394.

10. Lirici M.M., Melser A., Taddeo et al. Tissiu approximationin in minimally invasive gynecology. Endosc Surg Allied, 1994, vol. 2 (1), pp. 47-54.

11. Puchkov K.V., Rodichenko D.S. Ruchnoy shov v endoskopicheskoy khirurgii [Hand stitch in endoscopic surgery]. Moscow: Medpraktika, 2004. 140 p.

12. Emel’yanov S.I. Endoscopic surgery — new tasks and directions of scientific research. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya, 1997, no. 3, pp. 54-55 (in Russ.).

13. Asbun H.D., Berguer R., Altamirano R. et al. Successfully establishing laparoscopic surgery programs in developing countries. Clinical results and lessons learned. Surg Endosc., 1996, vol. 10, pp. 1000-1003.

14. Steele R.J., Hosking S.W. Chung S.C. Graded exercise for basic training in laparoscopic surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb., 1994, vol. 39 (2), pp. 112-116.