L.I. MALTSEVA¹, F.A. FATTAKHOVA¹, R.S. ZAMALEEVA¹, E.S. KURTASANOVA², G.Kh. KHRULEVA²

¹Kazan State Medical Academy — Branch Campus of the RMACPE MOH Russia, 36 Butlerov Str., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012

²Kazan (Volga) Federal University, 1A Chekhov Str., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420020

Maltseva L.I. — Doc. Med. Sc., Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 1, tel. +7-905-314-40-51, e-mail: [email protected],

Fattakhova F.A.  — Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 1, tel. +7-987-290-38-16, e-mail: f[email protected]

Zamaleeva R.S. — D. Med. Sc., Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 1, tel. +7-919-621-67-51, e-mail:[email protected]

Kurtasanova E.S. — Head of the Gynecology Department No.1, tel. +7-917-272-89-14, e-mail: [email protected]

Khruleva G.Kh. — Head of the Gynecological Department No. 3, tel. +7-917-295-09-13, e-mail: org16.ru.

The article presents a review of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library data regarding the cases of a special form of ectopic pregnancy — in the scar after cesarean section. A total of 2037 women with BCS are described. The review presents existing methods of diagnosis and treatment of this kind of pregnancy, their effectiveness, and own observations of the authors.

Key words: ectopic pregnancy, scar pregnancy, diagnosis, tactics of treatment.

REFERENCES

1. Birsh P., Hoffman E., Rifbjerg Larsen C., Svarre Neilsen H. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil. Steril., 2016, Apr; 105(4):958–67.
2. Shen L., Fu J., Huang W, Zhu H., Wang Q., Yang S, Wu T. Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. The Cochrane Collaboration and published in Cochrane Library, 2014, issue 7, p.18.
3. Ash A., Smith A. Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG, 2007,114:253–63.
4. Ngu S.F., Cheung V.Y. Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. J Gynecol Obstet., 2011, 115: 295-7.
5. Fylstra D.L. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar. a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv., 2002:57 537–43.
6. Gibbons L., Belizan J.M., Lauer J.A., Merialdi M., Althabe F. Inecvities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world. Am J Obstet Gynecol., 2012; 206:331 e. 1–19.
7. Hellerstein S., Feldman S., Duan T. China’s 50% caesarean delivery rate: is it too high? BJOG, 2015;122:160–4.
8. Enkin M.W., Wilkinson C. Single versus two suturing for closing the uterine incision at Cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 2007;(3):CD000192.
9. Hofmeyr G.J., Mathai M., Shah A., Novikova N. Techniques for cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 2008;(1):CD004662.
10. Rotas M.A., Haberman S., Levgur M. Caesarean scar pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis and management. ObstetGynecol., 2006;107:1373–81.
11. Gilmandyar D. Ultrasonography for caesarean scar ectopics. Ultrasound Clin., 2013;8:27–30.
12. Osborn D.A., Williams T.R., Craig B.M. Caesarean scar pregnancy sonographic and magnetic resonance, imaging findings, complications and treatment. J Ultrasound Med., 2012;31:1449–56.
13. Wang D.B., Chen Y.H., Zhang Z.F., Chen P., Liu K.P., Li Y. et al. Evaluation of the transvaginal resection of low-segment cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. FertilSteril., 2014;101:602–6.
14. Vial Y., Petignat P., Hohlfeld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol., 2000;16:592–3.
15. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii (protokol lecheniya) “Vykidysh v rannie sroki beremennosti: diagnostika i taktika vedeniya”, utverzhdennye Minzdravom Rossii i ROAG ot 7 iyunya 2016 g. No. 15-4/10/2-3482 [Clinical recommendations (protocol of treatment) «Miscarriage in early pregnancy: diagnosis and tactics of reference», approved by the Ministry of Health of Russia and ROAG on June 7, 2016 No. 15-4/10/2-3482]. 32 p.
16. Diagnosis and Menagment of Ectopic Pregnancy Green-top Guideline No.21 RCOG/AEPU Joint Guideline, November 2016. 41p.
17. Early pregnancy loss. Queensland Clinical Guideline. MN11.29-V2-R16 September 2011. Amendment date March 2015. 33 p.
18. Klinicheskiy protokol “Vnematochnaya beremennost’” [Clinical protocol «Ectopic pregnancy»], 2017.
19. Peng P., Gui T., Chen W., Lui Z. Comparative efficace and safety of local and systemic methotrexate injection in caesarean scar pregnancy. Ther Clin Risk Manag., 2015; 11:137–42.
20. Gao L., Huang Z., Gao J., Mai H., Zhang Y., Wang X. Uterine artery embolizationfollowed by dilation and curettage within 24 hours cjmpared with systemic methotrexate for caesarean scar pregnancy. Int J GynecolObstet., 2014;127:147–51
21. Timor-Tritsch I.E., Khatib N., Monteagudo A., Ramos J., Berg R., Kovacs S. Cesar ean scar pregnancies: experience of 60 cases. J Ultrasound Med., 2015;34: 601–10.
22. Cheng L.Y., Wang C.B., Chu L.C., Tseng C.W., Kung F.T. Outcomes of primary surgical evacuation during the first trimester in different types of implantation in women with cesarean scar pregnancy. FertilSteril., 2014;102:1085–90.e2.
23. Michaels A.Y., Washburn E.E., Pocius K.D., Benson C.B., Doubilet P.M., Carusi D.A. Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies diagnosed sonographically in the first trimester. J Ultrasound Med., 2015;34:595–9.
24. Jurkovic D., Ben-Nagi J., Ofilli-Yebovi D., Sawyer E., Helmy S., Yazbek J.E. aashsasu of Shirodkar cervical suture in securing hemostasis following surgical evasuation of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol., 2007;30:95–100.
25. Zosmer N., Fuller J., Shaikh H., Johns J., Ross J.A. Natural history of early first-trimester pregnancies implanted in Cesarean scars. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol., 2015;46:367–75.
26. Li N., Zhu F., Fu S., Shi X. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided tmbrio aspiration plus local administration of low-dose methotrexate for caesarean scar pregnancy. Ultrasound Med Biol., 2012;38:209–13.
27. Zhuang Y., Huang L. Uterine artery embolization compared with methotrexate for the management of pregnancy implanted within a cesarean scar. Am J Obstet Gynecol., 2009; 201:152.e1–3.
28. Li C., Feng D., Lia C., Liu B., Zhan X. Trascatheter arterial chemoembolization versus systemic methotrexate for menagment of caesarean scar pregnancy. Int J GynecolObstet., 2011;113:178-82.
29. Michener C., Dickinson J.E. Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a single centre case series. Aust N Z J ObstetGynaecol., 2009;49:451–5.
30. Wang C.J., Chao A.S., Yuen L.T., Wang C.W., Soong Y.K., Lee C.L. Endoscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Fertil Steril., 2006;85:494.e1–4.
31. Zhang Y., Duan H., Cheng J.M., Guo Y.S. Treatment options to terminate persistent cesarean scar pregnancy. GynecolObstet Invest., 2013;75:115–9.
32. Yang X.Y., Yu H., Li K.M., Chu Y.X., Zheng A. Uterine artery embolisation combined with local methotrexate for treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG, 2010;117:990–6.
33. Timor-Tritsch I.E., Khatib N., Monteagudo A., Ramos J., Berg R., Kovacs S. Cesarean scar pregnancies: experience of 60 cases. J Ultrasound Med., 2015; 34: 601– 10.
34. Cheng L.Y., Wang C.B., Chu L.C., Tseng C.W., Kung F.T. Outcomes of primary surgical evacuation during the first trimester in different types of implantation in women with cesarean scar pregnancy. FertilSteril., 2014;102:1085–90.e2.
35. Wu X., Zhang X., Zhu J., Di W. Caesarean scar pregnancy: comparative efficacy and safety of treatment by uterine artery chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate injection. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprodBiol., 2012; 161: 75–9.
36. Jiang T., Liu G., Huang L., Ma H., Zhang S. Methotrexate therapy followed by suction curettage followed by Foley tamponade for caesarean scar pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. Reprod Biol., 2011;156:209– 11.
37. Yang Q., Piao S., Wang G., Wang Y., Liu C. Hysteroscopic surgery of ectopic pregnancy in the cesarean section scar. J Minim InvasiveGynecol., 2009; 16:432–6.
38. Michaels A.Y., Washburn E.E., Pocius K.D., Benson C.B., Doubilet P.M., Carusi D.A. Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies diagnosed sonographically in first trimester. J Ultrasound Med., 2015;34: 595–9.
39. Yin X.H., Yang S.Z., Wang Z.Q., Jia H.Y., Shi M. Injection of MTX for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: comparison between different methods. Int JClinExp Med., 2014;7:1867–72.
40. Sevket O., Keskin S., Ates S., Molla T., Dansuk R., Yazicioglu H.F. et al. Is methotrexate administration needed for the treatment of caesarean section scar pregnancy in addition to suction curettage? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care, 2014;19:128–33.
41. Lian F., Wang Y., Chen W., Li J., Zhan Z., Ye Y. et al. Uterine artery embolization combined with local methotrexate and systemic methotrexate for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with different ultrasonographic pattern. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol., 2012;35:286–91.
42. Kutuk M.S., Uysal G., Dolanbay M., Ozgun M.T. Successful medical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies with systemic multidose methotrexate: single-center experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res., 2014;40: 1700–6.
43. Wang H.Y., Zhang J., Li Y.N., Wei W., Zhang D.W., Lu Y.Q. et al. Laparoscopic management or laparoscopy combined with transvaginal management of cesarean scar pregnancy. JSLS, 2013;17: 263–72.
44. Zhang Y., Gu Y., Wang J.M., Li Y. Analysis of cases with cesarean scar pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res., 2013; 39:195–202.
45. Huanxiao Z., Shugin C., Hongye J., Hongzhe X., Gang N., Chengkang X. et al. Transvaginalhysterotomy for caesarean scar pregnancy in 40 consecutive cases. Gynecol Surg., 2015;12:45–51.
46. Seow K.M., Wang P.H., Huang L.W., Hwang J.L. Transvaginalsono-guided aspiration of gestational sac concurrent with a local methotrexate injection for the treatment of unruptured cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet., 2013;288: 361–6.
47. Wang J.H., Xu K.H., Lin J., Xu J.Y., Wu R.J. Methotrexate therapy for cesarean section scar pregnancy with and without suction curettage. FertilSteril., 2009; 92:1208–13.
48. Yamaguchi M., Honda R., Uchino K., Tashiro H., Ohba T., Katabuchi H. Transvaginal methotrexate injection for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: efficacy and subsequent fecundity. J Minim Invasive Gynecol., 2014; 21:877–83.
49. Weilin C., Li J. Successful treatment of endogenous cesarean scar pregnancies with transabdominal ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprodBiol., 2014;183:20–2.
50. Wang C.J., Chao AS, Yuen L.T., Wang C.W., Soong Y.K., Lee C.L. Endoscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Fertil Steril., 2006;85:494.e1–4.
51. Zhang Y., Duan H., Cheng J.M., Guo Y.S. Treatment options to terminate persistent cesarean scar pregnancy. GynecolObstet Invest., 2013;75:115–9.
52. Yang X.Y., Yu H., Li K.M., Chu Y.X., Zheng A. Uterine artery embolisation combined with local methotrexate for treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG, 2010;117:990–6.
53. Cao S., Zhu L., Jin L, Gao J., Chen C. Uterine artery embolization in cesarean scar pregnancy: safe and effective intervention. Chin Med J (Engl)., 2014;127:2322–6.
54. Liang F., He J. Methotrexate-based bilateral uterine arterial chemoembolization for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand., 2010;89:1592–4.
55. Fahg A., Chen Q., Qian Z., Meng Y. Correlation questions clinical discussion of uterine artery embolization in induced abortion patients with management of cesarean scar pregnancy. J Reprod Contraception., 2009;20:153–60.
56. Shen L., Tan A., Zhu H., Guo C., Liu D., Huang W. Bilateral uterine artery chemoembolization with methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J ObstetGynecol., 2012;207:386.e1–6.
57. Polat I., Ekiz A., Acar D.K., Kaya B., Ozkose B., Ozdemir C. et al. Suction curettage as first line treatment in cases with cesarean scar pregnancy: feasibility and effectiveness in early pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med., 2015:1–6.
58. Peng M., Li L., Ding Y., Yu L., Deng Y., Zheng J. et al. Exploration of the successful treatment algorithms used in 23 cases of early live cesarean scar pregnancy. GynecolObstet Invest., 2015;79:139–44.
59. Weilin C, Li J. Successful treatment of endogenous cesarean scar pregnancies with transabdominal ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprodBiol., 2014; 183: 20–2.
60. Zhang X.B., Zhong Y.C., Chi J.C., Shen J.L., Qiu X.X., Xu J.R. et al. Caesarean scar pregnancy: treatment with bilateral uterine artery chemoembolization combined with dilation and curettage. J Int Med Res., 2012; 40: 1919–30.
61. Zhang B., Jiang Z.B., Huang M.S., Guan S.H., Zhu K.S., Qian I.S. et al. Uterine artery embolization combined with methotrexate in the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy. Resaltsof a case series and review of the literature. J VascIntervRadiol., 2012;23:1582–8.
62. Wang G., Liu X., Bi F., Yin L., Sa R., Wang D. et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic resection for the menagment of exogenous caesarean scar pregnancy. FertilSteril., 2014;101:1501–7.
63. Le A., Shan L., Xiao T., Zhuo R., Xiong H., Wang Z. Transvaginal surgical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet., 2013;287:791–6.
64. Li H., Guo H.Y., Han J.S., Wang J.L., Xiong G.W., Shen J. et al. Endoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean scar. J Minim Invasive Gynecol., 2011;18:31– 5.
65. Wang C.J., Tsai F., Chen C., Chao A. Hysteroscopic management of heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy. Fertil Steril., 2010;94:1529.e15–8.
66. Wang Z., Le A., Shan L., Xiao T., Zhuo R., Xiong H. et al. Assessment of transvaginalhysterotomy combined with medication for cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol., 2012;19: 639–42.
67. He M., Chen M.H., Xie H.Z., Yao S.Z., Zhu B., Feng L.P. et al. Transvaginal removal of ectopic pregnancy tissue and repair of uterine defect for caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG, 2011;118:1136–9.
68. 68.Huanxiao Z., Shuqin C., Hongye J., Hongzhe X., Gang N., Chengkang X. et al. Transvaginalhysterotomy for cesarean scar pregnancy in 40 consecutive cases. GynecolSurg., 2015;12:45–51.
69. Li J.B., Kong L.Z., Fan L., Fu J., Chen S.Q., Yao S.Z. Transvaginal surgical manage- ment of cesarean scar pregnancy: analysis of 49 cases from one tertiary care center. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol., 2014;182:102–6.
70. Wang Z., Le A., Shan L., Xiao T, Zhuo R, Xiong H, et al. Assessment of transvaginalhysterotomy combined with medication for cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol., 2012;19:639–42.
71. 71.Yin X., Su S., Dong B., Ban Y., Li C., Sun B. Angiographic uterine artery chemo- embolization followed by vacuum aspiration: an efficient and safe treatment for managing complicated cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet., 2012;285:1313–8.
72. Qian Z.D., Huang L.L., Zhu X.M. Curettage or operative hysteroscopy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet., 2015;292: 1055–61.
73. Gao L., Huang Z., Gao J., Mai H., Zhang Y., Wang X. Uterine artery embolization followed by dilation and curettage within 24 hours compared with systemic methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet., 2014;127: 147–51.
74. Wang J.H., Qian Z.D., Zhuang Y.L., Du Y.J., Zhu L.H., Huang L.L. Risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage at evacuation of a cesarean scar pregnancy following uterine artery embolization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet., 2013;123: 240–3.
75. 75.Wang Y.L., Weng S.S., Huang W.C., Su T.H. Laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancies in unusual locations. Taiwan J ObstetGynecol, 2014; 53:466–70.
76. Zhu X., Deng X., Wan Y., Xiao S., Huang I., Zhang L. et al. High-intensityfocusedultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015;94:e854.
77. Xiao J., Zhang S., Wang F., Shi Z., Zhou X. et al. Caesarean scar pregnancy noninvasive and effective treatment with high- intensity focused ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol., 2014;211:356.e1–6.