I.V. KLYUCHAROV^1,2, А.А. KHASANOV^1,2, I.R. GALIMOVA^1,2, R.F. GAYFULLIN²

¹Kazan State Medical University, 49 Butlerov St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012

²Republican Clinical Hospital of the MH of RT, 138 Orenburgskiy trakt, Kazan, Russian Federation, 420064

Klyucharov I.V. — Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology № 1, tel. +7-917-282-44-74, e-mail: gynecolog@pisem.net

Khasanov A.A. — D. Med. Sc., Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology № 1, tel. (843) 236-08-73, e-mail: albirkhasanov@mail.ru

Galimova I.R. — Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology № 2, Deputy Chief of obstetric and gynecological care, tel. (843) 231-20-75, e-mail: Ilmira.Galimova@tatar.ru

Gayfullin R.F. — chief doctor, tel. (843) 231-21-10, e-mail: mz.rkb@tatar.ru

The article provides a brief overview of modern technologies of treatment of intrauterine pathology and recommendations of their choice in clinical practice. Compares some of the technical parameters of instruments, indications for use, attention is drawn to the possible complications, and consider future directions in the treatment of intrauterine pathology.

Key words: office hysteroscopy, outpatient hysteroscopy, hysteroresection, global endometrial ablation, intrauterine morcellator, shaver, complications.

REFERENCES

1. Rafael F. Valle Development of hysteroscopy: From a dream to a reality, and its linkage to the present and future. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2007, vol. 14(1), pp. 407-418.
2. Strizhakov A.N., Davydov A.I. Gisterorezektoskopiya [Hysteroresectoscopy]. Moscow: Meditsina, 1997. 180 p.
3. Klivlend G.O., Abrosimova M.Yu., Klyucharov I.V. et al. A short essay on the contribution to the development hysteroscopy domestic gynecologists and gynecologists. Zhurnal mezhdunarodnoy meditsiny, 2014, no. 5 (10), pp. 35-37 (in Russ.).
4. Betocchi S., Selvaggi L. A vaginoscopic approach to reduce pelvic pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc., 1997, vol. 4, pp. 255-258.
5. Kulakov. V.I., Adamyan L.V. Endoskopiya v ginekologii: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey [Endoscopy in Gynecology: a guide for doctors]. Moscow: Meditsina, 2000. Pp. 180-190.
6. Klyucharov I.V., Klivlend G.O. Hysteroscopy and bipolar energy. Zhurnal mezhdunarodnoy meditsiny, 2014, no. 5 (10), pp. 88-90 (in Russ.).
7. Savel’eva G.M., Breusenko V.G., Kappusheva L.M. Gisteroskopiya: atlas i rukovodstvo [Hysteroscopy: Atlas and Manual]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2013. 248 p.
8. Daniilidis A., Pantelis A., Dinas K. et al. Indications of diagnostic hysteroscopy, a brief review of the literature. Gynecol Surg, 2012, vol. 9, pp. 23-32.
9. Fernandez H., Gervaise A., de Tayrac R. Operative hysteroscopy for infertility using normal saline solution and a coaxial bipolar electrode: a pilot study. Hum Reprod, 2000, vol. 15, pp. 1773-1775.
10. Sharma A., Bhalla R., O’Donovan P. Endoscopic procedures in ART: an overview. Gynecol Surg, 2004, vol. 1, rr. 3-9.
11. Tarasenko Yu.N., Salov I.A., Tashukhozhaeva D.T. et al. Intrauterine adhesions: a modern view on the problem, 2013, no. 4, pp. 141-145 (in Russ.).
12. Deprest Yan. Review of the achievements in the treatment of intrauterine fetal pathology. Problemy reproduktsii, 2009, no. 4, pp. 62-74 (in Russ.).
13. Kumar A., Kumar A. New hysteroscopy pump to monitor real-time rate of fluid intravasation. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 2012, vol. 19(3), rr. 369-375.
14. Vleugels MPH Normal saline field bipolar electrosurgery in hysteroscopy: report of the first 163 cases. Gynaecol Endosc, 2001, vol. 10, rr. 349-353.
15. Klyucharov I., Hassanov A., Samigullova A. A shaver-like system (SLS) for intrauterine pathology treatment, preclinical investigation. Gynecological surgery, 2011, vol. 8 (suppl. 1), r. 207.
16. Gurtcheff S.E., Sharp M.T. Complications associated with global endometrial ablation: the utility of the MAUDE database. Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 102, rr. 1278-1282.