A.I. GAYNETDINOV

Kazan State Medical Academy — Branch Campus of the RMACPE MOH Russia, 36 Butlerov Str., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012

  Gaynetdinov A.I. — postgraduated student of the Department of Urology and Nephrology, tel. +7-937-617-04-67, e-mail: gadel88doc@mail.ru

 The article views various methods of minimal invasive treatment of urolithiasis applied in Republic Clinical Hospital, their effectiveness in the treatment of emergency conditions in urolithiasis. Such surgery methods were considered as extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL), contact ureterolithotripsy with extraction (CULE), ureterial stent placement and percutaneous nephrostomy. The study included patients with renal calculus (46) and ureteral calculus of different level (the upper third (129, the middle third (74) and the lower third of the ureter (115)). These patients were treated on an emergency basis during the first 24 hours of hospitalization. The effectiveness of ESWL was 87.9 % and CULE efficiency was 92.4%. Thus, it was found that the minimally invasive methods of surgical treatment of patients with urolithiasis are an effective way of treatment at the first stage of hospitaization.

Key words: urolithiasis, shock-wave lithotripsy, contact ureterolithotripsy, renal colic.

 REFERENCES

1. Apolikhin O.I., Sivkov A.V. Moskalyova N.G. et al. Analysis of uronefrological morbidity and mortality in the Russian Federation for the period of ten years (2002-2012). According to official statistics. Experimental and clinical urology, 2014. no. 2, pp. 4-12.
2. Ol’shanskaya E.V. Doppler microwave radiometry and evaluation of renal blood flow in patients with urolithiasis: Authoref. dis. … cand. med. science, 2007. 23 p.
3.  Boutin P.S. Application of remote and contact lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones. Diss . cand . honey. Sciences, 2005. 169 p.

4. Volkov I.N., Boutin P.S., Dzeranov N.K. Lower ureteral stones . ESWL or contact ureterolithotripsy ? Proceedings of the Plenum of the Russian Society of Urology (Sochi , 28-30.04.2003), 2003, pp 91-92.
5.  Dzeranov N., Volkov I.N. Tactics of treatment with stones oklyuziruyuschih upper ureter. Materials of the Plenum of the Russian Society of Urology (Sochi , 28-30.04 . 2003), 2003, pp. 127-128.
6. Manukyan M.V. Lithotripsy and ureterorenoskopicheskaya contact lithotripsy in the treatment of patients with urolithiasis with stones ureter . Diss . Doctor . honey. Sciences, 2010. 47 p.
7. Rudenko V.I. Urolithiasis disease. Current problems in the diagnosis and choice of treatment . Diss . Doctor . honey. Sciences, 2004. 339 p.
8. Vicentini, Fabio C.In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy?: Opinion: NO. Int. braz j urol, 2015, vol.41, no.2, pp. 203-206.
9. Donaldson J.F.In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy?: Opinion: YES. Int. braz j urol, 2015, vol.41, no.2, pp.199-202.