A.A. KHASANOV, V.I. ZHURAVLEVA, D.I. GALAUTDINOVA

Kazan State Medical University, 49 Butlerov Str., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012

 Khasanov A.A. ― D. Med. Sc., Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology №1, tel. (843) 236-08-73, e-mail: ob_gyn@kgmu.kcn.ru

Zhuravleva V.I. ― Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology №1, tel. (843) 236-08-73, e-mail: ob_gyn@kgmu.kcn.ru

Galautdinova D.I. ― Junior Researcher of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology №1, tel. +7-917-920-86-56, e-mail: diana_gi@mail.ru

The article presents the results of reconstruction of inconsistent uterus scar through vaginal access outside of pregnancy. An inconsistent scar is a risk factor for fetoplacental insufficiency, fetal hypoxia, anomalies in the location and attachment of the placenta and rupture of the uterus along the scar. The operation was performed on 34 patients. A consistent scar was formed in 32 patients (94%) by the 6^th month after the operation. 13 patients (38%) became pregnant after 9 months ― 1.5 year, 7 of them delivered at 38-39 weeks. Endometriosis is one of the causes of the inconsistency of the uterus scar (32%).

Key words: inconsistent uterine scar, reconstruction, vaginal access.

REFERENCES

1. Bychkov I.V., Shamarin S.V., Bychkov V.I. The condition of the fetoplacental system in women with an incomplete scar on the uterus. Detskaya meditsina Severo-Zapada, 2011, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 10-12 (in Russ.).
2. Akusherstvo. Natsional’noe rukovodstvo, pod red. E.K. Aylamazyana, V.I. Kulakova, V.E. Radzinskogo, G.M. Savel’evoy [Obstetrics. National leadership. Ed. by E.K. Ailamazyan, V.I. Kulakov, V.E. Radzinsky, G.M. Savelieva]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2014. P. 1030.
3. Krasnopol’skiy V.I., Buyanova S.N., Shchukina N.A. Obstetrical sepsis as a reproductive problem . Akusherstvo i ginekologiya, 2007, no. 3, pp. 38-42 (in Russ.).
4. Fatkullin I.F., Gabidullina R.I., Galimova I.R. et al. Comparative analysis of the results of cesarean section: the choice of suture material and the method of suturing the uterus. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa, 2001, no. 1, pp. 83-85 (in Russ.).
5. Gabidullina R.I., Fatkullin I.F., Kiyasov A.P. et al. Clinical and morphological parallels in the assessment of the scar’s condition on the uterus after cesarean section. Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal, 2002, no. 6, pp. 424-429 (in Russ.).
6. Zalesnyy A.V. A mathematical model for predicting the condition of the scar on the uterus after cesarean section in conditions of practical medicine. Molodoy uchenyy, 2011, 2 (3), pp. 167-172 (in Russ.).
7. Gustovarova T.A., Ivanyan A.N., Korzhuev S.I. Conducting pregnancy and childbirth in patients with a scar on the uterus after cesarean section. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa, 2007, no. 4, pp. 45-49 (in Russ.).
8. Pavlova T.Yu., Filippova R.D., Kramarskiy V.A., Argunov V.A. Complex assessment of the nature of reparative processes in the area of ​​the uterus after cesarean section. Yakutskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal, 2008, no. 4, pp. 37-40 (in Russ.).
9. Buyanova S.N., Puchkova N.V. The inconsistent scar on the uterus after cesarean section: diagnosis, tactics of reference, reproductive prognosis. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa, 2011, no. 4, pp. 36-38 (in Russ.).
10. Morris H. Surgical pathology of the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar: is the scar a source of clinical symptoms? Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol, 1995, no. 14, rr. 16-20.
11. Thurmond A.S., Harvey W.J., Smith S.A. Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography. J. Ultrasound Med, 1999, no. 18, rr. 13-16.
12. Klemm P., Koehler C., Mangler M. et al. Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound. J. Perinat. Med, 2005, no. 33, rr. 324-331.
13. Fabres C., Arriagada P., Fernandez C., et al. Surgical treatment and follow-up of women with intermenstrual bleeding due to cesarean section scar defect. J. Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2005, no. 12, rr. 25-28.
14. Erickson S.S., Van Voorhis B.J. Intermenstrual bleeding secondary to cesarean scar diverticuli: report of three cases. Obstet. Gynecol, 1999, no. 93, rr. 802-805.
15. Bromley B., Pitcher B.L., Klapholz H., et al. Sonographic appearance of uterine scar dehiscence. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet, 1995, no. 51, pp. 3-S6.
16. Fabres C., Aviles G., De La Jara C. et al. The cesarean delivery scar pouch: clinical implications and diagnostic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy. J. Ultrasound Med, 2003, no. 22, rr. 695-700.
17. Buyanova S.N., Shchukina N.A., Chechneva M.A. et al. Modern methods of diagnosing insufficiency of sutures or scar on the uterus after cesarean section. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa, 2013, no. 1, pp. 73-77 (in Russ.).