pm mfvt1
    • Main page
      • About journal
      • Articles. Working with contents
      • Editor-in-chief
      • Editorial Council
      • Editorial Board


      • For authors
      • Standards for formatting information
      • Reviewing
      • Politics editorial board
      • Ethics of journal publications


      • For advertisers
      • Subscription
      • About the Publishing House
      • Contact us
  • Double mobility of the acetabular component as a method of hip arthroplasty in patients with complex orthopedic pathology

    Редактор | 2021, Original articles, Practical medicine part 19 №3. 2021 | 18 октября, 2021

    V.A. TOKAR1, V.V. NOVOMLINSKY1, VL.V. NOVOMLINSKY1, A.V. TOKAR2

     1Сlinical Hospital «RZhD-Meditsina», Voronezh

    2Alekseevskaya Central District Hospital, Belgorod oblast

     Contact details:

    Tokar V.A. — PhD (medicine), Head of the Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics, Head of the Traumatology and Orthopedics Department, Chief Freelance Traumatologist and Orthopedist of the South-Eastern Directorate of Health

    Address: 2 pereulok Zdorovya, Voronezh, Russian Federation, 394055, tel.: +7-910-342-52-67

    Due to the increase in the number of total hip arthroplasty operations throughout the world, the prevention of such complication as the endoprosthesis head dislocation is of paramount importance. The aim of this work is to familiarize specialists with the capabilities and the first experience of using the system with double mobility of the acetabular component as the most modern solution for the prevention of the endoprosthesis head dislocation during primary or revision arthroplasty of the hip joint. Based on the literature data, an analysis of the causes of the endoprosthesis head dislocation during hip arthroplasty is presented. The historical aspects and the first results of using the system with double mobility abroad are considered. The article presents the authors’ positive clinical experience of using this system in 22 patients with an increased risk of the endoprosthesis head dislocation.

    Key words: hip arthroplasty, double mobility of the acetabular component, dislocation of the endoprosthesis head, revision arthroplasty, complicated cases of arthroplasty.

    REFERENCES

    1. Kavalerskiy G.M., Murylev V.Yu., Rubin G.G., Rukin Ya.A., Elizarov P.M., Muzychenkov A.V. Endoprosthetics of the hip joint in patients with pseudarthrosis of the femoral neck. Vestnik travmatologiii ortopedii im. N.N. Priorova, 2016, no. 1, pp. 21–25 (in Russ.).
    2. Klyuchevskiy V.V., Danilyak V.V., Belov M.V., Gil’fanov S.I., Konev D.E., Klyuchevskiy I.V., Molodov M.A. Dislocations after total hip replacement: risk factors, methods of treatment. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii, 2009, no. 3, pp. 136–138.
    3. Rukovodstvo po khirurgii tazobedrennogo sustava, pod red. R.M. Tikhilova, I.I. Shubnyakova [Guide to surgery of the hip joint, ed. R.M. Tikhilov, I.I. Shubnyakov]. Saint Petersburg: RNIITO im. R.R. Vredena, 2014. Vol. 2. 356 p.
    4. Tikhilov R.M., Shubnyakov I.I., Kovalenko A.I.,Tsybin A.V., Semetkovskiy A.V., Karpukhin A.S., Bashinskiy O.A. Modern trends in orthopedics: revisions of the acetabular and femoral components. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii, 2012, no. 4, pp. 5–16 (in Russ.).
    5. Tikhilov R.M., Shubnyakov I.I., Kovalenko A.N., Chernyy A.Zh., Murav’eva Yu.V., Goncharov M.Yu. Data from the register of hip arthroplasty of the N.N. R.R. Harmful for 2007–2012. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii, 2013, no. 3, pp. 167–190.
    6. Tikhilov R.M., Shubnyakov I.I., Kovalenko A.N., Totoev P.A., Lyu B., Bilyk S.S. The structure of early revisions of hip arthroplasty. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii, 2014, no. 2, pp. 5–13 (in Russ.).
    7. Adam P., Farizon F., Fessy M.H. Dual articulation retentive ace- tabular liners and wear: surface analysis of 40 retrieved polyethylene implants. rev Chir orthop, 2005, vol. 91, pp. 627–636.
    8. Adam P., Philippe R., Ehlinger M., Roche O., Bonnomet F., Molé D., fessy M.H. Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation. Orthop Traumatol Surg res, 2012, vol. 98, pp. 296–300. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.01.005
    9. Alberton G.M., High W.A., Morrey B.F. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2002, vol. 84-A, pp. 1788–1792.
    10. Bayley N., Khan H., Grosso P., Hupel T., Stevens D., Snider M., Schemitsch E., Kuzyk P. What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA? Clin orthop relat res, 2015, vol. 473, pp. 477–484. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3824-2
    11. Blake S.M., Kitson J., Howell J.R., Gie G.A., Cox P.J. Constrained total hip arthroplasty in a paediatric patient with cerebral palsy and painful dislocation of the hip. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2006, vol. 88 (5), pp. 655–657. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.88B5.17206
    12. Blomfeldt R., Törnkvist H., Ponzer S., Söderqvist A., Tidermark J. Comparison of internal fixation with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures. Randomized, controlled trial performed at four years. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005, vol. 87, pp. 1680–1688. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02655
    13. Bozic K.J., Kurtz S.M., Lau E., Ong K., Vail T.P., Berry D.J. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in theUnited States. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009, vol. 91, pp. 128–133. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00155
    14. Callaghan J.J., Bracha P., Liu S.S., Piyaworakhun S.,Goetz D.D., Johnston R.C. Survivorship of a Charnleytotal hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at a minimumof thirty-five years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009, vol. 91 (11), pp. 2617–2621. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01201
    15. Caton J., Prudhon J.L. Over 25 years survival after Charnley‘s total hip arthroplasty. Int orthop, 2011, vol. 35 (2), p. 185. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1197-z
    16. Garbuz D.S., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P., Greidanus N.V.,Bohm E.R., Petrak M.J., Della Valle C.J., Gross A.E. The frank Stinchfield Award. Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? Clin orthoprelat res, 2012, vol. 470 (2), pp. 351–356. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2146-x
    17. Gioe T.J. Dislocation following revision total hiparthroplasty. Am Jorthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2002, vol. 31, pp. 225–227.
    18. Guyen O., Pibarot V., Vaz G., Chevillotte C., Béjui Hugues J. Use of a dual mobility socket to managetotal hip arthroplasty instability. Clin orthop relat res, 2009, vol. 467, pp. 465–472.
    19. Farizon F., de Lavison R., Azoulai J.J., Bousquet G. Resultswith a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility. Int orthop, 1998, vol. 22, pp. 219–224.
    20. Hamadouche M., Biau D.J., Huten D., Musset T., Gaucher F. The use of a cemented dual mobility socketto treat recurrent dislocation. Clin orthop relat res, 2010, vol. 468, pp. 3248–3254. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1404-7
    21. Iorio R., Healy W.L., Lemos D.W., Appleby D., Lucchesi C.A., Saleh K.J. Displaced femoral neck fracturesin the elderly: outcomes and cost effectiveness. Clin orthoprelat res, 2001, no. 383, pp. 229–242.
    22. Langlais F.L., Ropars M., Gaucher F., Musset T., Chaix O. Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clin orthop relat res, 2008, vol. 466, pp. 389–395. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-007-0047-9
    23. Lecuire F., Benareau I., Rubini J., Basso M. Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the Bousquet dual mobility socket. rev Chirorthop, 2004, vol. 90, pp. 249–255.
    24. McMinn D.J., Daniel J., Ziaee H., Pradhan C. Indication sand results of hip resurfacing. Int orthop, 2011, vol. 35 (2), pp. 231–237. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1148-8
    25. Patel P.D., Potts A., Froimson M.I. The dislocating hiparthroplasty: prevention and treatment. J Arthroplasty, 2007, vol. 22, pp. 86–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.111
    26. Philippot R., Farizon f., Camilleri J.P., Boyer B., Derhi G., Bonnan J., Fessy M.H., Lecuire F. Survival of cementless dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up. rev Chir orthop reparatrice Appar Mot, 2008, vol. 94 (8), pp. e23–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.rco.2007.10.013
    27. Philippeau J.M., Durand J.M., Carret J.P., Leclercq S., Waast D., Gouin f. Dual mobility design use in preventing total hip replacement dislocation following tumor resection. orthop Traumatol Surg res, 2010, vol. 96, pp. 2–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcot.2009.12.011
    28. Prudhon J.L., Ferreira A., Verdier R. Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up. Int orthop, 2013, vol. 37 (12), pp. 2345–2350. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2067-2
    29. Raphael B.S., Dines J.S., Akerman M., Root L. Long term follow up of total hip arthroplasty in patients with cerebral palsy. Clin orthop relat res, 2010, vol. 468, pp. 1845–1854. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1167-1
    30. Sanchez-Sotelo J., Haidukewych G.J., Boberg C.J. Hospital cost of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, vol. 88, pp. 290–294. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02799
    31. Sanders R.J., Swierstra B.A., Goosen J.H. The use of a dual-mobility concept in total hip arthroplasty patients with spastic disorders: no dislocations in a series of ten cases at midterm follow-up. Arch orthop Trauma Surg, 2013, vol. 133 (7), pp. 1011–1016. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1759-9
    32. Schairer W.W., Sing D.C., Vail T.P., Bozic K.J. Causes and frequency of unplanned hospital readmission after total hiparthroplasty. Clin orthop relat res, 2014, vol. 472 (2), pp. 464–470. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3121-5
    33. Schroeder K., Hauck C., Wiedenhöfer B., Braatz F., Aldinger P.R. Long-term results of hip arthroplasty in ambulatory patients with cerebral palsy. Int orthop, 2010, vol . 34, pp. 335–339. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0771-8
    34. Stroh A., Naziri Q., Johnson A.J., Mont M.A. Dual mobility bearings: a review of the literature. Expert rev Med Devices, 2012, vol. 9 (1), pp. 23–31. DOI: 10.1586/ERD.11.57
    35. Sutphen S.A., Mac Laughlin L.H., Madsen A.A., Russell J.H., McShane M.A. Prevalence of pseudo tumor in patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty evaluated with metal ion analysis and MARS-MRI. J Arthroplasty, 2016, vol. 31 (1), pp. 260–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.011
    36. Tarasevicius S., Busevicius M., Robertsson O., Wingstrand H. Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation rate afterarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord., 2010, vol. 11, pp. 175. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-175 

    Метки: 2021, A.V. TOKAR, complicated cases of arthroplasty, dislocation of the endoprosthesis head, double mobility of the acetabular component, hip arthroplasty, Practical medicine part 19 №3. 2021, revision arthroplasty, V.A. TOKAR, V.V. NOVOMLINSKY, VL.V. NOVOMLINSKY

    ‹ Problems of surgical treatment of the anterior pelvic ring chronic injuries Analysis of the results of surgical treatment of cervical spine hernias by anterior decompression and interbody cage stabilization ›
    • rus Версия на русском языке


      usa English version site


      Find loupe

      

    • PARTNERS

      пов  logonew
    «Для
    Practical medicine. Scientific and practical reviewed medical journal
    All rights reserved ©