I.S. MALKOV^1,3, E.B. BAGAUTDINOV¹, A.V. BERDNIKOV²

¹Kazan State Medical Academy, 36 Butlerov St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012

²Kazan State Technical University named after A.N. Tupolev, 10 Karl Marks St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420111

³MunicipalClinical Hospital № 7, 54 Chuykov St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420103 

Malkov I.S. — D. Med. Sc., Professor, Head of the Surgery Department, tel. +7-965-594-40-07, e-mail: [email protected]^1,3

Bagautdinov E.B. — resident doctor of the Surgery Department, e-mail: [email protected]¹

Berdnikov A.V. — Cand. Tech. Sc., Associate Professor of the Department of Appliances and Information and Measurement Systems, tel. +7-972-672-53-53, e-mail: [email protected]² 

Gastrointestinal motility is of great importance for life. This is a complex process involving the cells which «feel» the content of gastrointestinal tract, integrate information and generate the appropriate motor pattern. They convert input signals, generate the inherent electrical rhythm, and provide an appropriate response. There are many methods to explore the motor activity of the intestine. But the most widespread is electrogastroenterography. When acute small intestinal obstruction occurs, multiple violations may happen in life activity of an organism, one of which is the pathology of intestinal motility. With the change of the stage during acute intestinal obstruction, changes occur in peristalsis of the small intestine. To study the biopotential of gastrointestinal tract, an electrogastroenterograph was developed and introduced into clinical practice. The in-house study results of small intestine motility in acute adhesive small bowel obstruction are given. Electrogastroenterography can improve the diagnosis of acute intestinal obstruction.

Key words: acute small intestinal obstruction, motor activity of the intestine.

 

 

REFERENCES

1. Shmidt R. Fiziologiya cheloveka: v 3 t. Per. s angl. [Human Physiology: in 3 volumes. Transl. from English]. Moscow: MIR, 2005. Vol. II. Pp. 343-345.

2. Holzer P., Schicho R., Holzer-Petsche U. et al. The gut as a neurological organ. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr., 2001, no. 113, pp. 647-660.

3. Huizinga J.D., Lammers G. Gut peristalsis is coordinated by a multitude of cooperating mechanisms. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol., 2009, no. 296, pp. 1-8.

4. Gayvoronskiy I.V. Normal’naya anatomiya cheloveka v 2 t. [Normal human anatomy in 2 vol.]. Saint Petersburg: SpetsLit, 2011. Vol. 2. Pp. 227-232.

5. Prives M.G. Anatomiya cheloveka [Human anatomy]. Saint Petersburg: SPbMAPO, 2009. 720 p.

6. Piaseczna Piotrowska A., Rolle U. et al. Interstitial cells of Cajal in the human normal urinary bladder and in the bladder of patients with megacystis-microcolon intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome. BJU Int., 2004, no. 94, pp. 143-146.

7. Hashitani H., Suzuki H. Identification of interstitial cells of Cajal in corporal tissues of the guinea-pig penis. Br. J. Pharmacol., 2004, no. 141, pp. 199-204.

8. Shafik A. Study of interstitial cells in the penis: human study. J. Sex. Med., 2007, no. 4, pp. 66-71.

9. Harhun M., Pucovsky V., Povstyan O., et al. Interstitial cells in the vasculature. J. Cell. Mol. Med., 2005, no. 9, pp. 232-243.

10. Povstyan O.V., Gordienko D.V., Harhun M.I. et al. Identification of interstitial cells of Cajal in the rabbit portal vein. Cell. Calcium, 2003, no. 33, rr. 223-239.

11. Hirst G.D., Ward S.M. Interstitial cells: involvement in rhythmicity and neural control of gut smooth muscle. J. Physiol., 2003, no. 550, pp. 337-346.

12. Connor J.A., Prosser C.L., Weems W.A. A study of pace-maker activity in intestinal smooth muscle. J. Physiol., 1974, no. 240, pp. 671-701.

13. El-Sharkaway T.Y., Daniel E.E. Ionic mechanisms of intestinal electrical control activity. Am. J. Physiol., 1975, no. 229, pp. 1287-1298.

14. Nakayama S., Chihara S., Clark J. et al. Consequences of metabolic inhibition in smooth muscle isolated from guinea-pig stomach. J Physiol., 1997, no. 505 (Pt 1), pp. 229-240.

15. Farrugia G. Ionic conductances in gastrointestinal smooth muscles and interstitial cells of Cajal. Annu. Rev. Physiol., 1999, no. 61, pp. 45-84.

16. Thuneberg L. Interstitial cells of Cajal: intestinal pacemaker cells? Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell. Biol., 1982, no. 71, pp. 1-130.

17. Faussone-Pellegrini M.S., Cortesini C. The muscle coat of the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with achalasia and hypertensive sphincter. An electron microscopic study. J. Submicrosc. Cytol., 1985, no. 17, pp. 673-685.

18. Shafik A., El-Sibai O., Shafik I. et al. Electroesophagogramin gastroesophageal reflux disease with a new theory on the pathogenesis of its electric changes. BMC Surg., 2004, no. 4, p. 13.

19. Vanderwinden J.M., Liu H., De Laet. et al. Study of the interstitial cells of Cajal in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Gastroenterology, 1996, no. 111, pp. 279-288.

20. Shafik A., Shafik A.A., El-Sibai O. et al. Electric activity of the colon in subjects with constipation due to total colonic inertia: an electrophysiologic study. Arch. Surg., 2003, no. 138, pp. 1007-1011.

21. Pasternak A. et al. Interstitial cajal-like cells and bile lithogenicity in the pathogenesis of gall-stone disease. Pol. Przegl. Chir., 2013, Jun 1, no. 85 (6) , p. 311.

22. Gal’perin Yu.M. Parezy, paralichi i funktsional’naya neprokhodimost’ kishechnika [Paresis, paralysis, and functional bowel obstruction]. Moscow: Meditsina, 1975. 134 p.

23. Riezzo G., Imdrio F., Montagna O. et al. Gastric electrical activity and gastric empting in preterm newboms fed standart and hydrolysate formulus. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr., 2001, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 290-295.

24. Zhang F., Jiang D. Noninvasive measurement of gastric empting rates and gastric motility. Zhogguo.Yi.Liao.Xie.Za.Zhi, 2001, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 209-212.

25. Lebedev N.N. Bioritmy pishchevaritel’noy sistemy [Biorhythms of the digestive system]. Moscow: Meditsina, 1987. 104 p.

26. Biryal’tsev V.N., Berdnikov A.V., Filippov V.A. et al. Elektrogastroenterografiya v khirurgicheskoy gastroenterologii [Elektrogastroenterografiya in surgical gastroenterology]. Kazan: Izdatel’stvo Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2003. 154 p.

27. Huizinga J.D., Robinson T.L., Thomsen L. The search of the origin of rhythmicity in intestinal contraction: from tissue to single cells. Neurogastroenterol. Motil., 2000, no. 12, pp. 3-9.

28. Husebye E. The patterns of small bowel motility: physiology and implications in organic disease and functional disorders. Neurogastroenterol. Motil., 1999, no. 11, pp. 141–161.

29. Savel’ev B.C. Rukovodstvo po neotlozhnoy khirurgii organov bryushnoy polosti [Guidelines for emergency surgery of the abdomen]. Moscow: Triada X, 2004. 640 p.

30. Grigoryan R.A. Abdominal’naya khirurgiya. V 2 t. [Abdominal surgery. In 2 volumes]. Moscow: MIA, 2006. Vol. 2. 670 p.

31. Courtney M.T., Beauchamp R.D., Evars B.M. et al. Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. Philadelphia: SAUNDERS ELSEVIER, 2012. P. 2124.

32. Zinner M.J., Ashley S.W. (ed.). Maingots abdominal operations. N.Y.: McGrawHill Medical, 2007. P. 1267.

33. Eryukhin I.A., Petrov V.P., Khanevich M.D. Kishechnaya neprokhodimost’: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey [Intestinal obstruction: a guide for physicians]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 1999. 448 p.