pm mfvt1
    • Main page
      • About journal
      • Articles. Working with contents
      • Editor-in-chief
      • Editorial Council
      • Editorial Board


      • For authors
      • Standards for formatting information
      • Reviewing
      • Politics editorial board
      • Ethics of journal publications


      • For advertisers
      • Subscription
      • About the Publishing House
      • Contact us
  • Analysis of pachymetry and biometrics cornea results in patients with myopia

    Редактор | 2016, Practical medicine 06 (16) Ophthalmology | 14 ноября, 2016

    E.G. SOLODKOVA

    The Volgograd Branch of the S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, 80 Zemlyachki Str., Volgograd, Russian Federation, 400138

    Solodkova E.G. ― Head of the Department of Refraction Abnormalities Correction, tel. (8442) 91-72-62, e-mail: [email protected]

    The study included 21 patients (42 eyes) with myopia: mild myopia ― 7 people (14 eyes), moderate ― 8 people (16 eyes), and high ― 7 patients (14 eyes). The analysis of pachymetric and biometric data obtained by various methods in myopic patients showed no statistically significant difference between the measurements (t<2.0; p>0.05). The research results are comparable with each other, correct and can be used interchangeably in clinical practice.

    Key words: myopia, pachymetry, corneal biometry.

    REFERENCES

    1. Fridman F.E., Gundorova R.A., Kodzov S.B. Ul’trazvuk v oftal’mologii [Ultrasound in ophthalmology]. Moscow: Meditsina, 1989. P. 50.
    2. Eletheriadis H. IOL Master biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases. Br. J. Ophthalmol, 2003, vol. 87, pp. 960-963.
    3. Huang J., Lu W., Savini G. Evaluation of corneal thickness using a Scheimpflug-Placido disk corneal analyzer and comparison with ultrasound pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2013, vol. 39, no. 7, rr. 1074-1080.
    4. Avetisov S.E., Voroshilova N.A., Ivanov M.N. Optical coherence biometry Vestnik oftal’mologii, 2007, no. 4, pp. 46-47 (in Russ.).
    5. Findl O., Kriechbaum K., Sacu S. Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2003, vol. 29, no. 10, rr. 1950-1955.
    6. Utine C.A., Altin F., Cakir H. Perente I. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements taken with the Pentacam, Orbscan IIz and IOL Master in myopic and emmetropic eyes. Acta Ophthalmologica, 2009, vol. 87, no. 4, rr. 386-391.
    7. Read S.A., Collins M.J. Diurnal variation of corneal shape and thickness. Optometry and Vision Science, 2009, vol. 86, no. 3, rr. 170-180.
    8. Savini G., Carbonelly M., Barboni P., Hoffer K.J. Repeatability of automatic measurements performed by a dual Scheimpflug analyzer in unoperated and post-refractive surgery eyes. J. Cataract Refract. Surg, 2011, vol. 37, pp. 302-309.
    9. Shammas H.J., Hoffer K.J., Shammas M.C. Scheimpflug photography keratometry readings for routin intraocular lens power calculation. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2009, vol. 35, no. 2, rr. 330-334.
    10. Sheng H., Bottjer C.A., Bullimore M.A. Ocular component measurement using the Zeiss IOL Master. Optometry and Vision Science, 2008, vol. 8, no. 1, rr. 27-34.

    Метки: corneal biometry, E.G. SOLODKOVA, myopia, pachymetry, Practical medicine 06 (16) Ophthalmology

    ‹ Intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of macular edema in patients with chronic non-infectious uveitis and pseudophakia Morphological changes of spongiform allograft after drainage surgery of the posterior part of an eyeball ›
    • rus Версия на русском языке


      usa English version site


      Findloupe

      

    • PARTNERS

      пов  logonew
    «Для
    Practical medicine. Scientific and practical reviewed medical journal
    All rights reserved ©